Go back
Obama's agenda of change .....

Obama's agenda of change .....

Debates

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Office of the President-elect.

-Revitalizing the Economy

-Ending the War in Iraq

-Providing Health Care for All

-Protecting America

-Renewing American Global Leadership

-More Issues


Read more at:

http://change.gov/


*******************************************************

Will Obama be able to implement his plans and realise his policy of change? Will he be strong enough politically ? Will his opponents have the power to stonewall his plans ? How will they proceed if they can ? What do you think ?

Vote Up
Vote Down

"Renewing American global leadership"

I wonder what that implies.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
"Renewing American global leadership"

I wonder what that implies.
I think it means making America viewed worldwide as the good guys again, but that will be hard on the debates column if it happens. What will we argue about then?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sam The Sham
I think it means making America viewed worldwide as the good guys again, but that will be hard on the debates column if it happens. What will we argue about then?
Whether mullets are politically correct.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
"Renewing American global leadership"

I wonder what that implies.
Check out the Obama-Biden Plan:

http://change.gov/agenda/foreignpolicy/

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe

-Providing Health Care for All
I think I particularly like the sound of this one
-it is a pity that this basic principle is very slowly, quietly and unofficially being abandoned in the UK.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe
Check out the Obama-Biden Plan:

http://change.gov/agenda/foreignpolicy/
Mostly positive points, apart from the unconditional support for Israel, but that's electorally understandable.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Andrew Hamilton
I think I particularly like the sound of this one
-it is a pity that this basic principle is very slowly, quietly and unofficially being abandoned in the UK.
It is a consequense of the neo-liberal ( ... as it is called in the Netherlands) agenda which brought us the financial crisis and other surprises. Since this ideology broke down, I expect to see another way of thinking which does not raise the market to an idolatrous level, but in which government and regulation have their necessary place.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
Mostly positive points, apart from the unconditional support for Israel, but that's electorally understandable.
Not just electorally understandable. This will become clear when you read on .....

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe
Not just electorally understandable. This will become clear when you read on .....
I don't think the US can be a credible dialogue partner in solving the Israel/Palestine conflict if it unconditionally sides with one party.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sam The Sham
I think it means making America viewed worldwide as the good guys again, but that will be hard on the debates column if it happens. What will we argue about then?
China is becoming a growing power on the world scene, and the degree to which China and India are polluting the environment is increasing at an exponential rate. A little over 1/3 of the world's population are in India and China, between the two of them. It's going to be imperative to sell alternative energy technologies to these developing countries if we're going to save the environment. For the US to be in good hands is just the first step towards addressing these global issues.

Naturally, whichever countries are most powerful in the world are more likely to be a focus of attention that needs discussion. Sometimes, countries which are more powerful can become arrogant and selfish, and the US should be deeply proud of having voted to turn away from the path of arrogance and selfishness. That's arguably much better than the British Empire ever did when they had the world's power.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by karnachz
China is becoming a growing power on the world scene, and the degree to which China and India are polluting the environment is increasing at an exponential rate. A little over 1/3 of the world's population are in India and China, between the two of them. It's going to be imperative to sell alternative energy technologies to these developing countries if we' ...[text shortened]... at's arguably much better than the British Empire ever did when they had the world's power.
China and India are already investing massively in nuclear power, if only European and American governments had the guts to do so...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
China and India are already investing massively in nuclear power, if only European and American governments had the guts to do so...
You can lay the blame for that on your beloved Democrats in congress.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by ivanhoe
Office of the President-elect.

-Revitalizing the Economy

-Ending the War in Iraq

-Providing Health Care for All

-Protecting America

-Renewing American Global Leadership

-More Issues


Read more at:

http://change.gov/


*******************************************************

Will Obama be able to implement his plans and realise h ...[text shortened]... have the power to stonewall his plans ? How will they proceed if they can ? What do you think ?
All I can say is that any potential future failures for Obama can be directly attributable to "W" and/or the remaining Republicans in Congress.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by whodey
All I can say is that any potential future failures for Obama can be directly attributable to "W" and/or the remaining Republicans in Congress.
So no matter what Obama does, if it turns out to be a failure it is all GW's fault.

I can see this working for the next year or so, but in four years I don't think it will stick.