Originally posted by WulebgrI would argue that pornography is nothing more than "image making." Our modern understanding of it is sexualized, but isn't it really nothing more than making something inticing? Think about it the next time you see a car commercial, a political ad, an ad promising you have "great credit." All of these really are pornography.
so, do you agree with "I know it when I see it" Stewart, or will you give us your own definition?
4 edits
Originally posted by kirksey957Ok.
I would argue that pornography is nothing more than "image making." Our modern understanding of it is sexualized, but isn't it really nothing more than making something inticing? Think about it the next time you see a car commercial ...[text shortened]... g you have "great credit." All of these really are pornography.
I thought hard and long about this one.
The only argument I can make is based upon "Intent" of the perp.
Does this person want to "kill the soul" of the buyer? for what?
Money?
Ok.
That seems clear cut.
So. Porn is not just a body without clothes. Nor is it sex. Nor is it sex that is "seen" for money.
It is the soul who gives dope and doom to the women/kids. Who spread their child rearing glory for money. Who expose their only human asset for money. So that they can turn a buck. Maybe.
Porn seems to equate "People who will corrupt need/ability/only asset for money."
Another famous old saying i just made up.