The Trial Judge accepted that Pistorius had a subjective belief that he was in mortal danger. The appeals court overturned that finding of fact. Whether an appellate court can legally overturn a trial court's findings of fact (when the appeals court sees no witnesses or new evidence) according to SA law, seems to be a critical component of Pistorius' appeal to the Constitutional Court (though there are others).
Originally posted by no1marauder The Trial Judge accepted that Pistorius had a subjective belief that he was in mortal danger. The appeals court overturned that finding of fact. Whether an appellate court can legally overturn a trial court's findings of fact (when the appeals court sees no witnesses or new evidence) according to SA law, seems to be a critical component of Pistorius' appeal to the Constitutional Court (though there are others).
For Duchess64 it is simple. The victim was female, killed by a male. All else is meaningless. The male ought to die.
Originally posted by sonhouse Isn't that just you striking out at someone you don't like? You make it black and white with no gray areas. That is pretty stark.
You are quite right. I don't like Duchess64, and she doesn't like me. You did notice that too, didn't you?
Doesn't matter. You're a woman with an opinion of her own and that still grates on men with a grandiose sense of entitlement - a species far from extinct unfortunately.