@Suzianne saidIt's OK, Some folks shy from simple analogies, This one is especially difficult ... a law is that you can't shoot a gun, the spirit of the law is that it (was made) to control safety. I had to read it 3 times myself to get it. Well, I think i got it,,,,as I made it up.
Could you please stop writing about stuff you have no idea about?
I'm not assuming for you, but I am going by your own confession here.
@wildgrass saidWildgrass said this above: Birthright is simple, cheap and easy to administer.
I don't think our current system is as broken as it is portrayed. Birth tourism is less than 1% of US births. The scale of this problem is marginal and can be addressed through regulation rather than constitutional amendments. And I don't like the alternative systems for obtaining citizenship, which are more expensive and overly bureaucratic. We already wait in hours long l ...[text shortened]... ump hits a problem with the cudgel instead of using more logical, surgical and effective approaches.
I say that in its present form, the word should not even exist. This is above your head, but read literally, it means that the baby being birthed (the birthee) Has a RIGHT to be birthed as a citizen. The baby has no such right.
@Suzianne saidNo, there are differentiations of people, Suzianne. I just saw a video of Iranians doing their chant thing in a mosque kneeling, up down, face to floor, up , down, face to floor , 100 times. All the while chanting death to america. These are really not people. They do not qualify. They are humans. Savages. Not people. I hate it for you....as they are your brothers.
Someone has to constantly remind you people that they are people too.
*Maruader hates that word savages
@Suzianne saidyeah america better w/o racism. 🤔
The United States is ALWAYS better withOUT racism. Again, like it or not.
@AverageJoe1 saidhahahahahahahahahahaha
Wildgrass said this above: Birthright is simple, cheap and easy to administer.
I say that in its present form, the word should not even exist. This is above your head, but read literally, it means that the baby being birthed (the birthee) Has a RIGHT to be birthed as a citizen. The baby has no such right.
@AverageJoe1 saidMy point was that the alternatives are worse, but of course with you MAGA types you'll never think it through.
Wildgrass said this above: Birthright is simple, cheap and easy to administer.
I say that in its present form, the word should not even exist. This is above your head, but read literally, it means that the baby being birthed (the birthee) Has a RIGHT to be birthed as a citizen. The baby has no such right.
1 edit
@wildgrass saidThis post suggests that we are wrong, and thatyou are right, and I respect your saying that.
My point was that the alternatives are worse, but of course with you MAGA types you'll never think it through.
But your.’right’ is to take .from the monied and give to the lesser-monied. Sounds unfair, and certainly complicated!!!!
If we are 500 people living on an island and three guys have a whole lot more money than the rest of us, tell me,,,,and suann.. how much of their money does she get, how much do I get, how much do you get? How much will marauder get and how much will Shavixmir. Then there will be the doctor, the priest, the baker, and the Butcher, and the guy who makes the boat so we can all go fishing. And the guys that work for the guy that makes the boats. And the guy who cleans the fish. How much do each of them get.?