@suzianne saidYes… it was a joke…
You may find yourself living in a shotgun shack
You may find yourself in another part of the world
You may find yourself behind the wheel of a large automobile
You may find yourself in a beautiful house with a beautiful wife
You may ask yourself, well, how did I get here?
Letting the days go by, let the water hold me down
Letting the days go by, water flowing undergrou ...[text shortened]... e as it ever was
Same as it ever was, same as it ever was, same as it ever was, same as it ever was
@wajoma saidRicher than you, koala raper, richer than you.
shag doody for brains says this:
"...being happy in that state is but a sentiment to make the rich feel better about themselves. Fukk them. And everything they stand for".
Then brags it up about how rich he is.
But, out there in the trailer, it’s hard to be poorer.
@wajoma saidThanks for explaining how you miss the point like usual.
shag doody for brains says this:
"...being happy in that state is but a sentiment to make the rich feel better about themselves. Fukk them. And everything they stand for".
Then brags it up about how rich he is.
I just posted a piece about white privilege, even though I'm white and have benefited from white privilege. Go crap on that one, too.
@shavixmir saidSo you did make it up. That is what I thought.
How should I know?
What I wrote is correct. If she meant it or not, is beyond my knowledge.
@lundos saidWhat is your source of information?
I know Ida. She was talking about a potential future and should be seen as part of bigger picture in which all communication is free, cars are shared, homes are shared, where an algorithm buys what you need because it knows you better than yourself, and where robots do most of the work so humanity doesn't have to.
It's from her own words a dystopian future if we don't take care of where technology takes us.
@metal-brain saidNo. I did not make it up.
So you did make it up. That is what I thought.
It’s logical human behaviour.
And what she said fit it. But nor you, nor I, can look into her mind to know if it’s exactly what she was meaning.
@shavixmir saidI saw a Reuters (so called) fact check that claimed she was not talking about private property, but she said own "nothing". Private property is something, not nothing.
No. I did not make it up.
It’s logical human behaviour.
And what she said fit it. But nor you, nor I, can look into her mind to know if it’s exactly what she was meaning.
She didn't say almost nothing. So is she a communist?
@metal-brain saidWhy do you continually make sh-- up?
I saw a Reuters (so called) fact check that claimed she was not talking about private property, but she said own "nothing". Private property is something, not nothing.
She didn't say almost nothing. So is she a communist?
@Suzianne
What did I make up?
Are you making up that I made something up?
Easy on the psychological projection.
@metal-brain saidYou can read Danish newspapers from 2016. It was pretty well covered.
What is your source of information?
But here is one:
https://ekstrabladet.dk/nyheder/politik/danskpolitik/aukens-fantasifulde-fremtidsudsigter-flyvende-pastamaskiner-men-intet-privatliv/6455595