Originally posted by EladarSo your challenge to finding a single instance of me engaging in ad hominems is to call me a "leftist idiot"!
I see you post such nonsense fairly regularly, but I challenge you to find a single post where I have called you or any other right winger a "moron" or "stupid" or any other such term.
My post was in reaction to the other leftist idiot in this thread.
Well played. I submit.
Originally posted by randolphWhat's priceless is the fact that the American public would rather talk about this stuff instead of more important issues like why the taxpayers are being saddled with massive debt with all these bailouts for private companies...or why Americans have LOST 3% in real wages over the last 8 years. You all are now POORER and have been indebted up the ying yang yet you all want to talk about things like girls who can't keep their legs closed.....😕
Did anybody see her struggling to come up with an answer to the Bush Doctrine question? Priceless.
Originally posted by uzlessWell, we are actually talking about the girl that may be catalyst for 4 more years of taxpayers being saddled with massive dept and more loss in wages as well as jobs. We are not talking about Bristol, the girl that can't keep her legs closed.
What's priceless is the fact that the American public would rather talk about this stuff instead of more important issues like why the taxpayers are being saddled with massive debt with all these bailouts for private companies...or why Americans have LOST 3% in real wages over the last 8 years. You all are now POORER and have been indebted up the ying yang yet you all want to talk about things like girls who can't keep their legs closed.....😕
1 edit
Originally posted by CliffLandinBS. Palin is obviously a puppet for the Republican party.....another Dan Quayle. Another person who has no clue about how to be president and if by some unfortunate circumstance finds herself in the presidency then she would become just like George W/Ronald Reagan who would do and say whatever she is told to say by the Party.
Well, we are actually talking about the girl that may be catalyst for 4 more years of taxpayers being saddled with massive dept and more loss in wages as well as jobs. We are not talking about Bristol, the girl that can't keep her legs closed.
You guys are debating how many Angels could dance on the end of a pinhead.
At best, you are trying to just say, "hey, don't vote republican because they have an idiot as a VP" But idiots as VP's haven't stopped you lot from voting Republican in the past so what makes you think it'll work this time???
DEBATE THE ISSUES.....NOT THE PEOPLE!!!!!
Originally posted by kmax87I'm just beating the hard right brigade to the punch! Doing their work for them saying what they really would like to say. Hopefully this will take away their livelyhood and make them dependent on welfare, which might finally let them see life through someone else's eyes for a change. Probably wont but its worth a try.
Dems fighting words you effete, satanic influenced, child killing, elitist you.😛
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_doctrine
The Bush Doctrine is a term used to describe the foreign policy doctrine of United States president George W. Bush, enunciated in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks. It may be viewed as a set of several related foreign policy principles, including stress on ending terrorism, spreading democracy,[1] increased unilateralism in foreign policy[1] and an expanded view of American national security interests. Foreign policy experts argue over the meaning of the term "Bush Doctrine," and some scholars have suggested that there is no one unified theory underlying Bush's foreign policy. Jacob Weisberg identifies six successive "Bush Doctrines" in his book The Bush Tragedy,[2] while former Bush staffer Peter D. Feaver has counted seven.[3] Other foreign policy experts have taken the term to mean Bush's doctrine of preventive war, first articulated in 2002, which holds that the United States government should depose foreign regimes that represent a threat to the security of the United States, even if such threats are not immediate and no attack is imminent. This policy was used to justify the invasion of Iraq in March 2003.[4]
Originally posted by zeeblebotNo matter how anyone dances on the issue, this aspect of his way of thinking will probably be his legacy. The faulty intel the wmd that never were and then the pause, check and full throttle resume of business as usual will probably be a testament to his Rummy logic of doing something lest the nation be caught unaware by unknown unknowns.
Bush's doctrine of preventive war, first articulated in 2002, which holds that the United States government should depose foreign regimes that represent a threat to the security of the United States, even if such threats are not immediate and no attack is imminent. This policy was used to justify the invasion of Iraq in March 2003.[4]
Originally posted by kmax87In the American west where almost everyone is a Republican, the whole region has been on welfare since the very first Republican administration. They just don't call it welfare.
I'm just beating the hard right brigade to the punch! Doing their work for them saying what they really would like to say. Hopefully this will take away their livelyhood and make them dependent on welfare, which might finally let them see life through someone else's eyes for a change. Probably wont but its worth a try.
What started with railroad land grants in 1862 became unearmarked federal dollars for Alaska in 2007 because they're not building a bridge to nowhere, so they can spend the little piggie--lipstick and all--any way they want.
Welfare ranching, welfare logging, welfare mining: the basis of the West's independent spirit!!
Originally posted by zeeblebotOriginally posted by Wulebgr
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bush_doctrine
The Bush Doctrine is a term used to describe the foreign policy doctrine of United States president George W. Bush, enunciated in the wake of the September 11, 2001 attacks. It may be viewed as a set of several related foreign policy principles, including stress on ending terrorism, spreading democracy,[1] incr ...[text shortened]... attack is imminent. This policy was used to justify the invasion of Iraq in March 2003.[4]
Charles Krauthammer? If he coined the term, he doesn't know when or where. See http://edition.cnn.com/ALLPOLITICS/time/2001/03/05/doctrine.html. The title was probably written by some hack or student intern, but it stands at the top of Krauthammer's CNN editorial five weeks into the Bush administration.
see page one
The Wikipedia assertion that Bush's doctrine emerged in the wake of 9/11 is a conservative talking point, but it is bovine output.
Originally posted by randolphPalin believes the world is square, 10.000 years old, dinosaurs don't exist and that Gods and fairies do wonderful things.
Did anybody see her struggling to come up with an answer to the Bush Doctrine question? Priceless.
I think her struggling at a press conferance is the least of her worries...