@metal-brain saidThey do reduce the severity, which reduces the load on hospitals and medical facilities, lessening the likelihood that hospitals and medical facilities will be overwhelmed by COVID cases and rendered unable to treat other common cases such as heart attacks, strokes, car crash victims, etc.
More evidence the gene vaccines do not reduce the spread.
@metal-brain saidI know of a heavy smoker (former German chancellor Helmut Schmidt) who died only at 96 years and nor from lung carcinome, so smoking causes lung carcinome debunked?
More evidence the gene vaccines do not reduce the spread.
Statistics is never made from one case (at least not meaningful).
@metal-brain saidGood God man, get a grip!
More evidence the gene vaccines do not reduce the spread.
@metal-brain saidThat's she's 95 and experiencing "mild cold symptoms" from COVID is a pretty good anecdote pointing to the effectiveness of the vaccines.
More evidence the gene vaccines do not reduce the spread.
@contenchess saidIf you look at the queen's sons, you'll see they're ... just as screwed up as every other family.
If you saw the queen taking a dump you'd quickly see she is... not so special. 🤔
@metal-brain saidThey’re not gene vaccines.
She had a 1 in 20 chance of the gene vaccine being ineffective at best. Depends on which gene vaccine she claims she took.
And the question you should be asking is: how sick is she?
@shavixmir saidWhat is the title to this article?
They’re not gene vaccines.
And the question you should be asking is: how sick is she?
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33772572/