2 edits
Habeas corpus is missing from the Library Of Congress web page on the Constitution. Other parts of the Constitution have also been removed from the web site. People, this is not a 'coding error', there was no need to change any code -- there's an agenda afoot.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/key-sections-us-constitution-deleted-152939615.html?guccounter=1
https://takano.house.gov/newsroom/press-releases/library-of-congress-erases-parts-of-constitution-from-website-rep-takano-demands-answers
@moonbus saidIs it the case that the accuracy and reliability of the wording of the US Constitution rests on a webpage? I dont think so.
Habeas corpus is missing from the Library Of Congress web page on the Constitution. Other parts of the Constitution have also been removed from the web site. People, this is not a 'coding error', there was no need to change any code -- there's an agenda afoot.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/key-sections-us-constitution-deleted-152939615.html?guccounter=1
https://takano ...[text shortened]... ss-releases/library-of-congress-erases-parts-of-constitution-from-website-rep-takano-demands-answers
@Rajk999 saidIt's the library of Congress.
Is it the case that the accuracy and reliability of the wording of the US Constitution rests on a webpage? I dont think so.
Of course what we've seen in the recent version of the supreme Court is that it makes no difference what is written in the constitution at all. They make rulings that change how law is interpreted with zero explanation as to why.
1 edit
@moonbus
Article I, Section 9, Clause 2 of the Constitution states:
The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.
https://constitution.findlaw.com/article1/annotation46.html
How did Obama get away with it?
https://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/promises/obameter/promise/181/restore-habeas-corpus-rights-for-enemy-combatants/
The Supreme Court declined to hear the case on April 28, 2014, leaving the Second Circuit decision intact. That is how.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedges_v._Obama
@Rajk999 saidObviously the law has not changed just because a web page has been. But it's part of a pattern. The Trump administration has already made it's intentions clear, that it wants to suspend habeas corpus:
Is it the case that the accuracy and reliability of the wording of the US Constitution rests on a webpage? I dont think so.
quote
Miller, White House deputy chief of staff, described habeas corpus as a "privilege", and said Congress had already passed a law stripping judicial courts of jurisdiction over immigration cases.
Legal experts and critics have questioned the veracity of his interpretation of US law.
"Congress has the authority to suspend habeas corpus - not Stephen Miller, not the president," Marc Elias, an attorney for the Democratic Party, told MSNBC.
end quote
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0qgz18glljo
1 edit
@wildgrass saidNo explanation?? Every decision is explained in every case. I am always having to clean up posts. I am busy!!!! Geez
It's the library of Congress.
Of course what we've seen in the recent version of the supreme Court is that it makes no difference what is written in the constitution at all. They make rulings that change how law is interpreted with zero explanation as to why.
Supreme Court of the United States (.gov)
https://www.supremecourt.gov › opinions › opinions
Each opinion sets out the Court's judgment and its reasoning and may include the majority or principal opinion as well as any concurring or dissenting opinions.
As to getting to the bottom of the parts removed from some website, I will wait for Sonhouse's opiniion.
@AverageJoe1 saidNo.
No explanation?? Every decision is explained in every case. I am always having to clean up posts. I am busy!!!! Geez
Supreme Court of the United States (.gov)
https://www.supremecourt.gov › opinions › opinions
Each opinion sets out the Court's judgment and its reasoning and may include the majority or principal opinion as well as any concurring or dissenting ...[text shortened]... o getting to the bottom of the parts removed from some website, I will wait for Sonhouse's opiniion.
@moonbus saidNice, I agree. So if Trump tries to get out of hand [as he has done it already], then because there are three pillars of the US Constitution, he cannot succeed. I dont think the American citizen has anything to worry about. Most of what the US media reports is useless drama.
Obviously the law has not changed just because a web page has been. But it's part of a pattern. The Trump administration has already made it's intentions clear, that it wants to suspend habeas corpus:
quote
Miller, White House deputy chief of staff, described habeas corpus as a "privilege", and said Congress had already passed a law stripping judicial courts of jurisd ...[text shortened]... for the Democratic Party, told MSNBC.
end quote
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0qgz18glljo
@AverageJoe1 said
I certainly will and you cant stop me.
(spoken in Liberal-eze)
Since April, the justices have sided with Trump in all 15 rulings it has issued on the president’s emergency requests. That includes requests on immigration, the firing of federal workers, and the dismissal of transgender military service members.
Of those 15 rulings, the court has only written three majority opinions, Vladeck said, noting that seven have come with no explanation at all.