Go back
Reagan and Government Size

Reagan and Government Size

Debates

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26754
Clock
28 Dec 09
2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

I'm watching Reagan's inaugural speech in 1981 now. He's talking about intending to lessen the power of the Federal government e.g. 8:58 minutes in:



Did he lessen the "intervention and intrusion into our lives" as he put it of the Federal government? Did he limit the "unnecessary and excessive growth of government"?

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
Clock
28 Dec 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

No. Reagan was a coward. When Medicare was introduced, doomsday predictions galore. But when he had the chance to abolish it, he didn't, even though it would've made government smaller by quite a large chunk.

U

Joined
10 May 09
Moves
13341
Clock
28 Dec 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by KazetNagorra
No. Reagan was a coward. When Medicare was introduced, doomsday predictions galore. But when he had the chance to abolish it, he didn't, even though it would've made government smaller by quite a large chunk.
I've brought up the silly doomsday predictions a number of times myself. But when did he have the chance to abolish it?

Badwater

Joined
07 Jan 08
Moves
34575
Clock
28 Dec 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Reagan had no political chance to abolish Medicare and his administration knew it. His goal was welfare reform, which he had some measure of success with.

But government size is government size, and if you reduce domestic department size while massively ramping up the military then you're only reduction in government is in your own shrill hypoberlic mind.

TerrierJack

Joined
07 Mar 09
Moves
28919
Clock
28 Dec 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Badwater
Reagan had no political chance to abolish Medicare and his administration knew it. His goal was welfare reform, which he had some measure of success with.

But government size is government size, and if you reduce domestic department size while massively ramping up the military then you're only reduction in government is in your own shrill hypoberlic mind.
Reagan presided over the largest military buildup in history. He consistently asked for and spent more money than even a Democratic congress would approve. The only change he made was to weaken the people's ability to protect themselves from thieves and confidence-men.

M

Joined
08 Oct 08
Moves
5542
Clock
28 Dec 09
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

I've been waiting for the GOP to control the presidency, and both houses of Congress -- where the president actually believes in trying to make the government smaller.

I'd love to see the look on the GOP congressmen's faces at the State of the Union Address when this president makes his proposal that includes a bold plan to reduce annual spending on Medicare, Social Security, and Defense by at least 10-15% apiece.

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26754
Clock
28 Dec 09
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by TerrierJack
Reagan presided over the largest military buildup in history. He consistently asked for and spent more money than even a Democratic congress would approve. The only change he made was to weaken the people's ability to protect themselves from thieves and confidence-men.
To be fair, he does state in his inaugural address that he intends to keep the military strong and that we will act if need be in the interests of our national security.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.