Bin Laden wanted to eliminate Sadam Hussien and establish an Islamic theocracy in Iraq. We Americans, lead by our very bright president George W. Bush, at a cost of hundreds of billions of dollars and much American blood, have accomplished exactly what Bin Laden desired. I ask my Republican friends how they feel working for Bin Laden.
Originally posted by 667joeBack up your assertion with facts that can be verified.
Bin Laden wanted to eliminate Sadam Hussien and establish an Islamic theocracy in Iraq. We Americans, lead by our very bright president George W. Bush, at a cost of hundreds of billions of dollars and much American blood, have accomplished exactly what Bin Laden desired. I ask my Republican friends how they feel working for Bin Laden.
We've spent hundreds of billions, thousands of American lives and perhaps six hundred thousand Iraqi lives (according to a recent scientific study) to accomplish Bin Laden's objectives of getting rid of the secular Sadam Hussien, developing an Islamic theocracy and a training ground for terrorists.
For the same money, we could have avoided this horrific blood bath, secured our borders, provided universal health insurance and college education for our young people.
1 edit
Originally posted by 667joeOriginally posted by 667joe
Bin Laden wanted to eliminate Sadam Hussien and establish an Islamic theocracy in Iraq. We Americans, lead by our very bright president George W. Bush, at a cost of hundreds of billions of dollars and much American blood, have accomplished exactly what Bin Laden desired. I ask my Republican friends how they feel working for Bin Laden.
Bin Laden wanted to eliminate Sadam Hussien and establish an Islamic theocracy in Iraq.
Well no, because:
1) Bin Laden had absolutely no popular support in the middle east and wasn't known over there.
2) He was rich and working for the CIA, and couldn't care less about Islam or anything. Just a spoiled child.
Bin Laden was trying to help the Taliban in Afganistan, but failing, mainly because the people supported Massoud, who was the absolute opposite of Bin Laden: poor, respected and wanting to install a multi-etnic government over there.
Bin Laden was a joke in the middle east untill GWB decide to convert him in the symbol of anti-imperialisn and turn him in the eyes of some in a kind of hero.
Originally posted by JeeSo you agree with my thesis. Thank you!
Originally posted by 667joe
[b]Bin Laden wanted to eliminate Sadam Hussien and establish an Islamic theocracy in Iraq.
Well no, because:
1) Bin Laden had absolutely no popular support in the middle east and wasn't known over there.
2) He was rich and working for the CIA, and couldn't care less about Islam or anything. Just a spoiled child.
...[text shortened]... vert him in the symbol of anti-imperialisn and turn him in the eyes of some in a kind of hero.[/b]
Originally posted by 667joeYou are 100% correct my friend.
Bin Laden wanted to eliminate Sadam Hussien and establish an Islamic theocracy in Iraq. We Americans, lead by our very bright president George W. Bush, at a cost of hundreds of billions of dollars and much American blood, have accomplished exactly what Bin Laden desired. I ask my Republican friends how they feel working for Bin Laden.
After the fall of communism the NEO-CONSERVATIVES in the USA needed a new enemy to keep their power.
Power is achieved by giving the population a new ‘unknown’ enemy to be scared off and the Neo-conservatives become the proctor of the people against this unknown, unseen enemy
Bin-Laden and the so called ‘militant’ Islam was their perfect bogyman.
Thus grew a new industry for the Neo-Conservatives and their supports
Originally posted by 667joeYou said Bin Laden wanted to install a theocraty in Irak:
It's not how you start out, it's how you finnish. Reads his last line
No
You said that BL achieved this thanks to GWB
No.
BL never wanted it, never even thought of it.
Just happened to be there. US will put it back to the bin ( 😀 ) where he belongs the moment they found another easy target/puppet.
They just destroy lives in order to achieve their goal (Noriega, Castro, Allende, Lumumba, Chavez, Arbenz, Hussein among others).
So far they have failed only with Chavez, which is still the only one to claim openly at UN that GWB is a terrorist.
The Zapatistas in Chiapas are showing the example to the world, how the peasants of one country can throw away the corrupt government and take control of their own country and destiny. All the rest are following the orders of the US out of fear to loose money.
All cowards - viva Zapata, and good luck Chavez.
PS: if you haven't see "The Revolution won't be televised". Get it now!
Originally posted by SALADINDon't know about links, but I am reading two massive books on it right now. Will take a while, but will let you know. There are some videos out there...I mean in real life not sure about internet.
Any links bro... that i can read up on?
What I know is that they hold a territory bigger than Ireland: Chiapas.
If anybody has link post them.
Originally posted by SALADINNo one had to "create" Bin-Laden, he crashed the party on 9/11.
You are 100% correct my friend.
After the fall of communism the NEO-CONSERVATIVES in the USA needed a new enemy to keep their power.
Power is achieved by giving the population a new ‘unknown’ enemy to be scared off and the Neo-conservatives become the proctor of the people against this unknown, unseen enemy
Bin-Laden and the so called ‘militant’ Is ...[text shortened]... their perfect bogyman.
Thus grew a new industry for the Neo-Conservatives and their supports