@Mott-The-Hoople saidGood going, Irony Man.
Did you ever once consider the fact that you are a fool posting unhinged things?
@Mott-The-Hoople saidThat's been going on a long time now.
well its official...metalbran got his ass handed to him
He's just too stupid to know that.
Sound familiar?
@Suzianne said"How much nonsense should you have to post before efforts to limit that nonsense happen?"
How much nonsense should you have to post before efforts to limit that nonsense happen?
Penalties for repeat offenses should be higher. You can't just continue doing what you've been told not to do.
I'm surprised you never got feedback on your nonsense before this.
This isn't the "National Enquirer" forum.
you certainly have pushed the limits
@Cliff-Mashburn saidYou do not know it is not true. You have what is called an opinion.
They rejected your post because it wasn't true.
Why do you think I created the thread? So people like you can debate it.
Take it to that thread.
- Joined
- 09 Jan 22
- Moves
- 1139
@Metal-Brain saidYour problem is Trump has not been convicted of any such thing and NO ONE has stepped forward and said Trump molested them when they were minors. No one has even come forward and said they witnessed such, so where are you getting this child-molestor claim from?
You do not know it is not true. You have what is called an opinion.
Why do you think I created the thread? So people like you can debate it.
Take it to that thread.
@Russ saidThen you should explain that on your guidelines that you do not have to respect your own guidelines. Much like the DNC does not have to follow their own rules because they are a privately owned you do have that legal right, but it is not reasonable.
@Metal-Brain
Why would you believe you have absolute freedom of speech on a moderated privately owned forum? If a moderator doesn't like your content, it goes, no explanation required even though it is often offered.
Generally there is a high level of tolerance for everyone's views, because there is an effort to support the principals of freedom of speech, even though it ...[text shortened]... g called Trump's minions is quite amusing. Guess what plenty of other moderation complaints say....
It is ironic that you do not want a debate about Trump on the debate forum. An Epstein victim alleged Trump molested her. We cannot debate that? You are more than welcome to express your opinion on that thread. I never made any attempt to censor your opinions.
When you prevent a fair debate on the debate forum it is not only silly, it is offensive. It is also ineffective because all you do is strengthen the resolve of those you censored. Not only did I create another thread with the same title but I created this thread to bring attention to your political bias. You are supposed to allow a debate to determine if something is true or false. That is the whole purpose of debates.
What is the specific reason you deleted my thread? Were you offended that I called the pussy grabber a child molester? If so, would you be equally offended if I created a thread called Joe Biden is a child molester? Because I intend to do that too.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Donald_Trump_Access_Hollywood_tape
@Cliff-Mashburn said"NO ONE has stepped forward and said Trump molested them when they were minors."
Your problem is Trump has not been convicted of any such thing and NO ONE has stepped forward and said Trump molested them when they were minors. No one has even come forward and said they witnessed such, so where are you getting this child-molestor claim from?
That is not true. See my thread "Trump is a child molester". I posted a link proving an Epstein victim alleged just that in the OP. You had every opportunity to debate it on that thread. Just like Russ did on the first one he censored.
Could it be that you are both afraid of a debate about it? People allege things on here that are unproven all the time. I once created a thread saying Biden sexually assaulted Tara Reade. Tara did make that allegation.
Why wasn't that thread censored as well? Partisan bias of course. But that is what debates are for. To let the partisan biased to debate it out.
@Suzianne saidWhat offense did I violate? Russ already admitted I did not violate any posting Guidelines. Try to keep up.
How much nonsense should you have to post before efforts to limit that nonsense happen?
Penalties for repeat offenses should be higher. You can't just continue doing what you've been told not to do.
I'm surprised you never got feedback on your nonsense before this.
This isn't the "National Enquirer" forum.
@Russ
I noticed that you deleted the other thread as well. Didn't you want to debate the subject? Let me guess, you did not want to call the Epstein victim a liar. Right?
https://www.thedailybeast.com/key-details-of-13-year-old-trump-accusers-accounts-are-verified/
So because you knew you could not debate it without appearing to victimize the victim again and making yourself look bad you shut down the debate. Right?
You are not respecting the spirit of debates. Nobody shuts down debates that they think they can win. They only do that with debates they think they will lose. It is the cowards way out.
@Russ saidI LOVE the 'we owe you nothing'. LIBS HATE your saying that. Being dependents, it does not set well with them. They feel, and sometimes pull off, the spoils of 'something for nothing' every day.
@Metal-Brain
Why would you believe you have absolute freedom of speech on a moderated privately owned forum? If a moderator doesn't like your content, it goes, no explanation required even though it is often offered.
Generally there is a high level of tolerance for everyone's views, because there is an effort to support the principals of freedom of speech, even though it ...[text shortened]... g called Trump's minions is quite amusing. Guess what plenty of other moderation complaints say....
Frankly, I wish you would not give them the satisfaction of response on this forum. Let them hash it out in their own pitiful ways, like coons and bobcats all dropped into the same cage.
Good stuff, monitor
Like you said, RHP owes them nothing ....no Duty of Care in legal jargon.