1. Joined
    03 Feb '07
    Moves
    193733
    26 Jul '11 07:31
    Originally posted by normbenign
    That is a rational argument for local gun control, however in the light of the 14th amendment, it goes out the window.
    Well, not even the latest decision eliminates gun control.
  2. Joined
    03 Feb '07
    Moves
    193733
    26 Jul '11 07:34
    Originally posted by normbenign
    Scalia and the conservatives on the court are usually not willing to make sweeping decisions, but try to craft rulings which apply only to the present case.
    Well, when it means reading statements into an old decision that don't exist, that's the worst example of "Judicial Activism."

    It's like the Gore v. Bush case, which you're not supposed to cite because it applies only to that case. Good luck with that!
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree