Go back
Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator

Robust Nuclear Earth Penetrator

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Siskin
That money is probably mostly for anyone in the US military or 'intelligence' services who can come up with a decent acronym.

my copyright suggestion is Terminating Underground Reactor Destroyer

by the way Shav, shouldn't you update your location from Sewers of Holland to Bangkok Ladyboy Brothel?
Maybe that should be the Bunker Underground Site Hoax.....

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by General Putzer
NO crappy little third world countries should have nukes, that's what we're talking about. We need to prevent them from getting their hands on them because they will eventually be used.
I'm just as worried about stupid first world countries having and using nukes than the crappy third world coutries...

Who's this collective 'we' you're talking about?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Anyways...what's the point of having nuclear weapons if you're not going to use them?

It seems an awful lot of tax-payers money to waste on something you don't plan to use.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Will Everitt
They don't sell that oil and they will starve and be to poor to be able to extract it.

I really think that the best sign the USA could give would be a stern warning , the offer of non-military aid and disarm their own nukes to say they will never use them again.

USA - Has nukes, Has declared war on other countries recently, has used nukes in the p ...[text shortened]... g them, Has threatened but not invaded other countries in the last few years, never used nukes.
The fact they have never used nukes is now a defense for them to be able to aquire them? What kind of logic is that? Of course they never used them if they never had them for gods sake.