In the middle of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, John McCain wants to change the subject from the central question of this election.
Perhaps that's because the policies McCain supported these past eight years are pretty hard to defend.
The Obama campaign put together a documentary about why John McCain's failed philosophy and poor judgment are a recipe for deepening the crisis.
Watch the documentary now and share it with others:
http://my.barackobama.com/keatingvideo
Originally posted by WulebgrNewsflash: In 1991, after a lengthy investigation by the Senate Ethics Committee, Senators John Glenn and John McCain were cleared of having acted improperly but were criticized for having exercised "poor judgment".
In the middle of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, John McCain wants to change the subject from the central question of this election.
Perhaps that's because the policies McCain supported these past eight years are pretty hard to defend.
The Obama campaign put together a documentary about why John McCain's failed philosophy and poo ...[text shortened]...
Watch the documentary now and share it with others:
http://my.barackobama.com/keatingvideo
I'm much more interested in why Barrack Hussein Obama palled around with 1960s radical terrorist bomber William Ayers:
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/10/07/cnn-obamas-lying-about-william-ayers/
Originally posted by WulebgrLets not forget that one of the Keating 5 (Glen) is an Obama advisor.
In the middle of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, John McCain wants to change the subject from the central question of this election.
Perhaps that's because the policies McCain supported these past eight years are pretty hard to defend.
The Obama campaign put together a documentary about why John McCain's failed philosophy and poo ...[text shortened]...
Watch the documentary now and share it with others:
http://my.barackobama.com/keatingvideo
Originally posted by der schwarze RitterLet me get this straight. You are much more interested in Obama's old pals than the financial crisis?
I'm much more interested in why Barrack Hussein Obama palled around with 1960s radical terrorist bomber William Ayers:
http://hotair.com/archives/2008/10/07/cnn-obamas-lying-about-william-ayers/
Are you insane?
Originally posted by WulebgrExcellent video. Unfortunately the Republicans have shown an inability to learn anything and they have the delusion that everything wrong is the Democrates fault, so they'll vote for McCain no matter what.
In the middle of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, John McCain wants to change the subject from the central question of this election.
Perhaps that's because the policies McCain supported these past eight years are pretty hard to defend.
The Obama campaign put together a documentary about why John McCain's failed philosophy and poo ...[text shortened]...
Watch the documentary now and share it with others:
http://my.barackobama.com/keatingvideo
Originally posted by LundosI think the conservatives voting for McCain are more anti-Obama than they are pro-McCain. Its the "lesser of two evils" thing.
Excellent video. Unfortunately the Republicans have shown an inability to learn anything and they have the delusion that everything wrong is the Democrates fault, so they'll vote for McCain no matter what.
Originally posted by WulebgrThis is more applicable:
In the middle of the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression, John McCain wants to change the subject from the central question of this election.
Perhaps that's because the policies McCain supported these past eight years are pretty hard to defend.
The Obama campaign put together a documentary about why John McCain's failed philosophy and poo ...[text shortened]...
Watch the documentary now and share it with others:
http://my.barackobama.com/keatingvideo
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e73_1223406668
Originally posted by Dace AceInteresting. So both sides are to blame. No surprise there. The question then is, who will be the better man to clean up the mess? A law professor, who apparently have some of Fannie's former board of directors among his chief economic advisors, or a guy who admits himself, that he doesn't know much about economics and neither does his running mate. Both have made appalling political mistakes along the way, and my guess is, they're not done yet. We live in interesting times.
This is more applicable:
http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=e73_1223406668