@athousandyoung saidAttack the assertions, not the source of the assertions.
"For a change"?
If you can prove even one assertion wrong you can discredit the source. You are trying to do it backwards to avoid proving anything wrong. That is the whole purpose of attack the source tactics. It is a resort of desperation. The weak always resort to it.
@metal-brain saidI hope you learn to take your own advice.
Attack the assertions, not the source of the assertions.
If you can prove even one assertion wrong you can discredit the source. You are trying to do it backwards to avoid proving anything wrong. That is the whole purpose of attack the source tactics. It is a resort of desperation. The weak always resort to it.
@metal-brain saidApparently he did: https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-resurfaced-clip-russia-baltic-states-1997-video-1685864
According to the article below Biden in 1997 said that the only thing that could provoke a "vigorous and hostile" Russian response would be if NATO expanded as far as the Baltic states.
https://www.globalresearch.ca/biden-confirms-why-us-needed-this-war-regime-change-moscow/5775817
I don't have a twitter account anymore. Can someone verify Biden said that on twitter?
@no1marauder saidThanks.
Apparently he did: https://www.newsweek.com/joe-biden-resurfaced-clip-russia-baltic-states-1997-video-1685864
It looks like Zelenskyy is being a dick again. It is back on.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/putin-outraged-zelenskyy-note-delivered-151705385.html