I think Sambo has an agenda that he wants to bring to peoples attention. I actually agree with a lot of what he is saying. If you don't like his posts don't read them. I really can't be bothered to count them but i would imagine that there are even more posts going on and on about sambo. A lot more boring/pointless and often harder to avoid. Sambo stang sambo stang.....its tedious.
If you disagree with him then say why. If you don't like his posts don't read them. Do something you enjoy instead 🙂
Originally posted by WajomaIf you were an owner you'd have ME banned too - and I don't do any of the naughty thing Sambo is accused of.
If it were possible to be embarassed for anothers actions, I would be embarassed for you. Your stangbo spamming does your 'cause' more harm than good. This site and the forums are privately owned, the owners set the conditions, it is a business with the aim of making a profit. I am sure that you, stankbo are costing the owners money.
If I were an owner you would be banned.
Originally posted by scottishinnzI'm going to repeat this post of mine from another thread. It probably fits this thread better anyway.
If you were an owner you'd have ME banned too - and I don't do any of the naughty thing Sambo is accused of.
Stang is incredibly repetitive, tiring and simplistic in insisting that all the world's current problems are created by Bush. It's difficult to fault someone whose life seems to revolve around world peace, though I think his incessant propaganda promotionals probably hurt his cause more than help it. I have no problem with him being banned but I do question the wisdom of an open-ended forum ban on any subscriber. I also see no way that it can be enforced since the banned person can simply return as a non-paying non-subscriber and continue posting in the forums, which I believe Stang is probably doing. I personally would rather be debating the original entity than the umpteenth incarnation of that entity under various non-subscriber handles.
Originally posted by Sambo69no sambo it wasn't, if you knew your history....even after nagasaki there was a very active group of senior japanese officers that opposed surrendering and were attempting to overthrow the emperor in order to keep on fighting, you dimbulb. educate yourself.
The first bomb wasn't enough ?
Originally posted by boarmanSimple, BAN HIM!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
lets see what the forum thinks of sambo69.
I personally think that all his posts are crap,he cant seem to start one where he isnt bagging America or George Dubya Bush.
I do not like George Dubya but you have to stop somewhere but not poor old Sambo he just has to go on and on and on.
Does anyone else share my thoughts ,if so let us know what you think of Sambo.
IMHO
GV
Originally posted by JokerFiveYes, but the Japanese were beaten. The only argument the US has is that the lives of it's soldiers are worth more than the lives of ordinary Japanese men, women and children.
no sambo it wasn't, if you knew your history....even after nagasaki there was a very active group of senior japanese officers that opposed surrendering and were attempting to overthrow the emperor in order to keep on fighting, you dimbulb. educate yourself.
Originally posted by sasquatch672Spending your time reading something repetitive that you know you don't like and then moaning about it seems like a strange passtime to me. It's your life.....whatever floats your boat.
Get it up there real good. Come on...SHOVE! Shove it up there so far you can taste it. I want you to taste it.
By the way, are you some kind of pervert? Is there something you are trying to tell us but don't quite know how to put it?
Originally posted by JokerFiveThat's why I asked the question.
no sambo it wasn't, if you knew your history....even after nagasaki there was a very active group of senior japanese officers that opposed surrendering and were attempting to overthrow the emperor in order to keep on fighting, you dimbulb. educate yourself.