Go back
Should ignoring emergency warnings be a criminal offense?

Should ignoring emergency warnings be a criminal offense?

Debates

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
With all this talk about people going to jail for leaving guns and ammo lying around the house, it got me thinking about the morons who drive around in their Chevy Aveos in the middle of a 2 foot blizzard to get to some damn shopping mall in spite of begs and pleas from the authorities to stay home unless you HAVE TO travel.

http://blogs.wsj.com/metropolis/2 suspended. If you can't behave responsibly with a driver's license, you shouldn't have one.
Dude..............it is rarely the little cars like the Aveos that are making the news on account of operator stupidity in a blizzard. It is almost ALWAYS goddamn SUV drivers. Put an apple-pie eatin' American assmunch in an SUV and they think they're bloody invincible.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
Suggestion: If you do visit NYC (and it's a wonderful place to visit) DO NOT tour Manhattan by car, especially on a week day. It's very high stress, high intensity driving with heavy traffic, confusing directions and signs and it's near impossible to park unless you park in a garage, which will cost you an arm, a leg and your first born.

Plus, there is such ...[text shortened]... e around in a car anyway. It's much less stressful not having a car in Manhattan, trust me.
Generally speaking I tend to think the idea of venturing into Manhattan is academic unless you want to wind up knifed, car-jacked, pounded into a bloody pulp, or otherwise hammered into the shape of a pomegranate. I've also noticed, upon one such venture in a wholly expendable Geo Metro years ago, that all the bumpers on the streets were scratched and dented. Bloody hell hole.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
Actually, I think it's more the type of government interference that Republicans like. 😉

In all seriousness, this is a public health issue, not a privacy issue. People don't have a privacy interest in behaving in a manner that endangers the public.
A public health issue? Now that opens up a can of worms does it not? What about: Enviornmental laws, child labor laws, consumer protection laws: Most of which were voted against by Republicans, citing it would be bad for business. These were all public health issues the G O P had no problem opposing. Now you want to make an exception for weather? Better be careful...your Republican friends will start calling you a closet Liberal!

😲

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Soothfast
Generally speaking I tend to think the idea of venturing into Manhattan is academic unless you want to wind up knifed, car-jacked, pounded into a bloody pulp, or otherwise hammered into the shape of a pomegranate. I've also noticed, upon one such venture in a wholly expendable Geo Metro years ago, that all the bumpers on the streets were scratched and dented. Bloody hell hole.
Typical snap judgment based on reputation and not reality. New York is the safest big city the US and most of Manhattan south of Central Park are among the safest parts of the city. If you're afraid to move around midtown or downtown during the day for fear of crime you're either clueless or paranoid.

As for the driving, yes, driving is tough. There is a lot of tight traffic and thousands of cabs and millions of pedestrians who have no time to let you actually get to where you're going. That's why you take the train or the bus or a cab and leave the car at home.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
Suggestion: If you do visit NYC (and it's a wonderful place to visit) DO NOT tour Manhattan by car, especially on a week day. It's very high stress, high intensity driving with heavy traffic, confusing directions and signs and it's near impossible to park unless you park in a garage, which will cost you an arm, a leg and your first born.

Plus, there is such ...[text shortened]... e around in a car anyway. It's much less stressful not having a car in Manhattan, trust me.
Absolutely. I definitely want to visit NYC again and I doubt I'd want to drive it.

It's a great city that I don't know if I want to live in, but I love to visit 🙂

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
Typical snap judgment based on reputation and not reality. New York is the safest big city the US and most of Manhattan south of Central Park are among the safest parts of the city. If you're afraid to move around midtown or downtown during the day for fear of crime you're either clueless or paranoid.

As for the driving, yes, driving is tough. There is a lot ...[text shortened]... e you're going. That's why you take the train or the bus or a cab and leave the car at home.
So many people have such a ridiculous vision of big cities - and NYC is the icon of big cities.

Vote Up
Vote Down

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

The post that was quoted here has been removed
Hello Pot? Yeah, this is Kettle ...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Sleepyguy
Hello Pot? Yeah, this is kettle ...
Maybe he is from a big city? 😛

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by PsychoPawn
Maybe he is from a big city? 😛
Maybe.

Or maybe he's a pathetic troll who joined 3 days ago, hasn't made a single move and doesn't know the difference between the words "then" and "than."

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
Maybe.

Or maybe he's a pathetic troll who joined 3 days ago, hasn't made a single move and doesn't know the difference between the words "then" and "than."
A little from column A, a little from column B...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by sh76
With all this talk about people going to jail for leaving guns and ammo lying around the house, it got me thinking about the morons who drive around in their Chevy Aveos in the middle of a 2 foot blizzard to get to some damn shopping mall in spite of begs and pleas from the authorities to stay home unless you HAVE TO travel.

http://blogs.wsj.com/metropolis/2 ...[text shortened]... suspended. If you can't behave responsibly with a driver's license, you shouldn't have one.
If there is no difference between a 'warning' and a 'law', then don't call them 'warnings.' Americans should be free to do with 'warnings' what they will -- heed them or ignore them. That's freedom.

Freedom to ignore warnings is not good because it is particularly advisable -- it is good because broad freedom of action encourages individuals to be more independent, vigorous and creative -- useful transferable skills.

Vote Up
Vote Down

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by spruce112358
If there is no difference between a 'warning' and a 'law', then don't call them 'warnings.' Americans should be free to do with 'warnings' what they will -- heed them or ignore them. That's freedom.

Freedom to ignore warnings is not good because it is particularly advisable -- it is good because broad freedom of action encourages individuals to be more independent, vigorous and creative -- useful transferable skills.
Now they're merely warnings. My proposal was to make them into laws.

I agree in principal with the second statement. But grand social theories end where public safety begins.