I was thinking that instead of the usual uneasy relationship candidates are supposed to have with corporate sponsorship, why not simply let the market decide and have say Macca's sponsor McCains bid. Marketing wise it could be a bonanza for both sides.
I mean McCain and Palin could jump aboard his bus and do a breakfast tour of all the marginal states for instance.
To promote the tour Macca's could have a tie in where you can then come in and buy special MacMcCain breakfasts. They could really gauge the popularity of the ticket by how many people come along. Who needs polls when you have sales receipts to guide you.
Like you could supersize to a McMilf combo, the only additional cost being your credibility. Most people wont notice the additional asking price though, the thought of a juicy stud mcmuffin burgher with lashings of additional melted mature cheese should do the trick. Oh yeah and all servings are fried in extra oil for taste, at no additional cost.
It should sell like hot cakes. What do y'all think?
Originally posted by kmax87I thought McCain owned McDonalds hence the BIG MAC, NO?
I was thinking that instead of the usual uneasy relationship candidates are supposed to have with corporate sponsorship, why not simply let the market decide and have say Macca's sponsor McCains bid. Marketing wise it could be a bonanza for both sides.
I mean McCain and Palin could jump aboard his bus and do a breakfast tour of all the marginal states for ...[text shortened]... oil for taste, at no additional cost.
It should sell like hot cakes. What do y'all think?