Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. 06 Nov '09 23:25 / 1 edit
    Specifically, embryonic stem cell research.
    Discuss
  2. 06 Nov '09 23:41
    Originally posted by Ropespierre
    Specifically, embryonic stem cell research.
    Discuss
    Adult stemcell research should be funded. There are no moral controversies in this field.
  3. Donation rwingett
    Ming the Merciless
    06 Nov '09 23:51
    Originally posted by Ropespierre
    Specifically, embryonic stem cell research.
    Discuss
    "Ropespierre?" Is that supposed to be a joke?
  4. 07 Nov '09 03:29
    Originally posted by rwingett
    "Ropespierre?" Is that supposed to be a joke?
    Yes, but I don't believe that has anything to do with stem cell research
  5. Donation rwingett
    Ming the Merciless
    07 Nov '09 12:42
    Originally posted by Ropespierre
    Yes, but I don't believe that has anything to do with stem cell research
    There's nothing to discuss. Stem cell research should be funded. End of story. Those who are stupid enough to take an opposing opinion should be...well...sent to the guillotine. Or hanged, as the case may be.
  6. 07 Nov '09 12:50
    I don't know about the scientific merits of stem cell research, but funding should be based on that.
  7. 07 Nov '09 17:55
    Originally posted by Ropespierre
    Specifically, embryonic stem cell research.
    Discuss
    yes, of course.
  8. 07 Nov '09 19:29 / 1 edit
    as long as they're going to throw away harvested embryos, they may as well use them for a purpose. stem cells, fertilizer, or stir fry.

    just guessing, probably near-term abortions are not usable for stem cells. so don't see why the majority of people would have a problem with it.

    don't the majority of people support abortions that are not near-term or 3rd-trimester?