15 Mar '04 14:43>
To clear things up and make things clearer:
I mean all drugs.
I mean all drugs.
Originally posted by shavixmirI don't think you can simply the debate this much. By talking about all drugs under one heading you are placing caffine and heroin in the same catagory. I think a lot of the question comes down to how much restriction should be placed on a drug and by what criteria are these restrictions chosen.
To clear things up and make things clearer:
I mean all drugs.
Originally posted by jimmyb270If someone pays their taxes all there life, why shouldn't they recieve medical attention? What if a doctor smokes the occasional joint, should they be denide this too? I can see what your getting at but it's a bit silly.
Basically, let people take drugs, or drive without a seatbelt, or do any of the other things that essentially hurt no-one else, but make them pay for any medical treatment they need as a direct result. No NHS treatment, no insurance cover, nothing.
Originally posted by shavixmirYou betcha.
I was debating this issue yesterday during a break at work.
The same old Legalise it and Criminalise it arguments seemed to pass the review, so then I added my two cents worth.
Let me make a few assumptions here and let's see if we can find a general consensus on the issue?
A lot of the more conservative elements within society point to legalising d ...[text shortened]... t that is a different discussion for a later date.
What do you all think?