18 Sep '16 19:55>
Originally posted by twhiteheadI am influenced by the Bible and the US Constitution
Then you have clearly been brainwashed by someone, if not fox, then who?
Originally posted by EladarI very much doubt that either of those lead you to believe that the use of 'libtard' was a reasonable description of anybody.
I am influenced by the Bible and the US Constitution
Originally posted by no1marauderHuman beings are contradictory. it is human nature.
Certainly almost the exact opposite is true; human beings resist authority almost from birth. Most social training is designed to get us over our innate desire to be free.
Of course, your premises are contradictory and nonsensical - humans can't both be designed to "have an innate desire to be ruled over" AND "God [have] made us free". IF God made us with an innate desire to be ruled over, he did not make us free.
Originally posted by EladarSo, you cannot explain what you mean by 'libtard'? And in what way does that label make me 'blind to reality'?
Bad guess. I've read both. In any case you are a libtard so you are blind to reality
Originally posted by twhiteheadLibtard means that being a liberal also means you are an odiot who is unable to see reality. It is a combination of retard and liberal.
So, you cannot explain what you mean by 'libtard'? And in what way does that label make me 'blind to reality'?
What would you say in the constitution influenced you? Are you sure you were not influenced first and just use the constitution to confirm those beliefs? Why would you be influenced by the constitution if not through a desire to be ruled?