17 Nov '15 23:23>
Originally posted by RJHindsWhy not?
I would not doubt that it makes sense to you. You think a Christian should believe in evolution.
Originally posted by SuzianneI will provide links to two videos that gives answers to the following questions:
Why not?
Originally posted by RJHindsYeah, go on believing in fairy tales. That way you ENSURE the US falls way behind in science AND becomes the laughing stock of the entire planet of humans. Way to go.
I will provide links to two videos that gives answers to the following questions:
Can you be a Christian and believe in evolution?
[youtube]nCBXX6VOvZ4[/youtube]
Join Dr. Brad Harrub as he answers the question of whether or not a Christian can be an evolutionist. Is theistic evolution right? Is Christianity compatible with evolution? Should a Chistian believe in Macroevolution?
[youtube]IbEIoz23VTo[/youtube]
Originally posted by sonhouseI have no power to ensure the U.S. falls behind in science or anything else you attribute to me.
Yeah, go on believing in fairy tales. That way you ENSURE the US falls way behind in science AND becomes the laughing stock of the entire planet of humans. Way to go.
Originally posted by RJHindsNot just you, I am talking about the real asssholes in places like Kentucky where they want to force creationism to be taught as a science in a science class instead of where it belongs, in mythology. That kind of thing is what shorts out the love of science in young impressionable minds and they decide to be a lawyer instead or a preacher.
I have no power to ensure the U.S. falls behind in science or anything else you attribute to me.
But speaking of Hillary Clinton did you know that the reason many Democrats give for wanting Hillary as President is that it is time for a woman to be President? Did you see this video about it?
[youtube]TcrA8ehw2e4[/youtube]
Originally posted by DeepThoughtIt was a total fabrication, and it was so easily debunked that it was stupid to portray it as true."I remember landing under sniper fire. There was supposed to be some kind of a greeting ceremony at the airport, but instead we just ran with our heads down to get into the vehicles to get to our base."I do not see how this could be construed as stupid.
Originally posted by normbenigna different kind of stupid to say that the pyramids were built by josef, that old people are not worth the medical attention or that the world was created in 6 days.
It was a total fabrication, and it was so easily debunked that it was stupid to portray it as true.
Originally posted by ZahlanziPeople can accept evolution, or reject it, or simply, as I do, admit they "don't know". If I accepted creation, I would have to abandon my atheism, but that doesn't mean I'm ignorant for not accepting evolution as an explanation of life.
untrue.
anyone who doesn't wish to be ignorant is supposed to accept evolution. not just christians.
Originally posted by sonhouseThis is merely a pushback for the requirement that the fairy tale of macroevolution be taught in school as if it were real science. 😏
Not just you, I am talking about the real asssholes in places like Kentucky where they want to force creationism to be taught as a science in a science class instead of where it belongs, in mythology. That kind of thing is what shorts out the love of science in young impressionable minds and they decide to be a lawyer instead or a preacher.
Originally posted by ZahlanziThese are theories. It is not stupid to propose theories as to what may have happen. I bet you don't consider the theories of evolution, big bang, and abiogenesis as stupid, like I do. Some people are going to be ignorant, like you, and therefore we will have differences of opinion.
a different kind of stupid to say that the pyramids were built by josef, that old people are not worth the medical attention or that the world was created in 6 days.
a different kind of stupid than to say mexican immigrants are coming to rape, murder and steal.
Originally posted by RJHindsLet's see. 300 years of solid scientific growth V the same tired biblical fairy tales that have not changed in 4000 years. I and billions like me will take science thank you very much.
This is merely a pushback for the requirement that the fairy tale of macroevolution be taught in school as if it were real science. 😏
Originally posted by sonhouseThat may be a lifetime for you and me. 😏
Let's see. 300 years of solid scientific growth V the same tired biblical fairy tales that have not changed in 4000 years. I and billions like me will take science thank you very much.
Your window of pejoratives and such is quickly diminishing to zero. So writhe away while you can. You may not have more than ten or twenty years of life left in those tired arguments of the bible.