1 edit
@mott-the-hoople saidNot hypocrisy.
like the dems paid for impeaching Trump TWICE?
😂 oh the hypocrisy
I think the term is repetition compulsion. It's a psychological disorder.
They are repeating past mistakes for no reason.
Why? Why would they hold a public hearing in which they don't have any knowledgeable witnesses, reveal no new information, and allow the Dems to take control and argue for subpoenas to Lev Parnas and Guiliani, who can testify as to how the investigation was started in the first place?
Like they'll ever get a single lib to vote for trump. Not going to happen, ever.
@wildgrass saidhypocrisy with a little stupidity added now
Not hypocrisy.
I think the term is repetition compulsion. It's a psychological disorder.
They are repeating past mistakes for no reason.
Why? Why would they hold a public hearing in which they don't have any knowledgeable witnesses, reveal no new information, and allow the Dems to take control and argue for subpoenas to Lev Parnas and Guiliani, who can testify as t ...[text shortened]... the first place?
Like they'll ever get a single lib to vote for trump. Not going to happen, ever.
@wildgrass saidThey did indeed. But in liberal-eze you do not round out your post by saying..."However, we do feel there is a need to Do What We Are Doing!! An Inquiry Into This Horrible State of Affairs with Our President's Family, Not Unlike A Mafia."
You sell a conjecture laden story. But..... We just had an impeachment inquiry hearing which aired all the evidence and the republicans witness said there isn't enough evidence for impeachment.
WGrass, why did you leave that out of your post? Suzianne, for instance, will say that you are sayin there is only conjecture (whatever that is...). Now, we can't have that , can we!! Please finish your post, you do not want AvJoe finishing your post.
@mott-the-hoople saidThankyou for this sensible post. It is difficult bringing these libs along. Esp MarauderNo1.
at this point, Turley hasnt seen all the evidence yet.
This is not about impeaching biden. Not every republican would vote to have an inquiry . Much less a democrat controlled senate convicting.
It is a way for the American people to see what is going on with the biden brand. The majority of MSM runs cover for democrats.
A very smart play …the word will be heard now.
@wildgrass saidHmmmmm. you suggest that the repubs were travelling on skimpy knowledge.....Why did not Hillary tell them she was lying her ass off , as we watched the millions being spent on her fake paid-for dossier?
Not hypocrisy.
I think the term is repetition compulsion. It's a psychological disorder.
They are repeating past mistakes for no reason.
Why? Why would they hold a public hearing in which they don't have any knowledgeable witnesses, reveal no new information, and allow the Dems to take control and argue for subpoenas to Lev Parnas and Guiliani, who can testify as t ...[text shortened]... the first place?
Like they'll ever get a single lib to vote for trump. Not going to happen, ever.
Your post is garbage dump. You will be repaid in kind if the Wimpy repubs can get their act together, but alas, I fear it is too late. I have been saying, I say again, you libs will prevail in the end. I guess I will be able to write about that as well, because I will shift over to your side as a socialist. Won't miss a beat. I will promote pure equality among all of society. You will get Bezos and Musk, et al, but I will be in a bubble, you won't find me.
@averagejoe1 saidAs laid out in the hearing, the investigation has been ongoing for 8 months. They subpoenaed bank records. The GOP lawyers poured through thousands of pages of documents.
They did indeed. But in liberal-eze you do not round out your post by saying..."However, we do feel there is a need to Do What We Are Doing!! An Inquiry Into This Horrible State of Affairs with Our President's Family, Not Unlike A Mafia."
WGrass, why did you leave that out of your post? Suzianne, for instance, will say that you are sayin there is only conjecture ...[text shortened]... we can't have that , can we!! Please finish your post, you do not want AvJoe finishing your post.
This hearing was supposed to lay out evidence about the impeachable offenses. We got bubkus. I guess they can just keep on investigating the same thing, but it's honestly looking more and more like nothing.
These were GOP lawyers saying there was not evidence to impeach.
@wildgrass saidAn inquiry hasnt started.
As laid out in the hearing, the investigation has been ongoing for 8 months. They subpoenaed bank records. The GOP lawyers poured through thousands of pages of documents.
This hearing was supposed to lay out evidence about the impeachable offenses. We got bubkus. I guess they can just keep on investigating the same thing, but it's honestly looking more and more like nothing.
These were GOP lawyers saying there was not evidence to impeach.
“Turley said he did not believe the evidence so far supported bringing articles of impeachment against Biden. But Turley said the threshold had been met to launch an inquiry. To support his position, he asserted that Biden had made “demonstrably untrue” statements about business deals and had been the focus of a “multimillion-dollar” influence-peddling effort.”
evidence SO FAR
1 edit
@mott-the-hoople saidwhat's the difference between an investigation and an inquiry? One could argue that the same alleged crime of "peddling" has been under investigation since 2018. You seem to lack the self awareness to realize this starts to sound like the libs going after Trump's Russia connections, except with a lot less to go on.
An inquiry hasnt started.
“Turley said he did not believe the evidence so far supported bringing articles of impeachment against Biden. But Turley said the threshold had been met to launch an inquiry. To support his position, he asserted that Biden had made “demonstrably untrue” statements about business deals and had been the focus of a “multimillion-dollar” influence-peddling effort.”
evidence SO FAR
Peddling? Really? We've been at this for years and we can't describe it as fraud, laundering, abuse of power? Not even the GOP lawyers are saying that?
Repetitive compulsion. It's a mental disorder.
@wildgrass saidyou are correct in saying that not a single lib would vote for Trump but how many libs will change sides and then, vote for Trump.
Not hypocrisy.
I think the term is repetition compulsion. It's a psychological disorder.
They are repeating past mistakes for no reason.
Why? Why would they hold a public hearing in which they don't have any knowledgeable witnesses, reveal no new information, and allow the Dems to take control and argue for subpoenas to Lev Parnas and Guiliani, who can testify as t ...[text shortened]... the first place?
Like they'll ever get a single lib to vote for trump. Not going to happen, ever.
Odds now are Trump $2.63 Biden $3.00 and I believe that the polls reflect this. Now 'if' the Dems are in the majority, how is this possible. My take on it all is that people are becoming less concerned about Trumps guilt and more concerned about the blatantly obvious Lib hypocrisy. (they are as guilty as sin but claim to be virtuous, while they are obviously anything but) They are increasingly seen as far more covertly nasty, yet the Republicans, like them or not, are what they are, at least more so, ok much more so.
1 edit
@jimmac said
you are correct in saying that not a single lib would vote for Trump but how many libs will change sides and then, vote for Trump.
Odds now are Trump $2.63 Biden $3.00 and I believe that the polls reflect this. Now 'if' the Dems are in the majority, how is this possible. My take on it all is that people are becoming less concerned about Trumps guilt and more concerned about ...[text shortened]... nasty, yet the Republicans, like them or not, are what they are, at least more so, ok much more so.
you are correct in saying that not a single lib would vote for Trump but how many libs will change sides and then, vote for Trump.
None. No one.
I can understand why folks like his charisma and moxie, but his record as president was abysmal. Botched the COVID response, the failed immigration plans, increased the rate of federal spending higher than Obummer, $8 trillion debt. Unless you are already in his cult, no one wants to go through that again.
No matter what Biden does, he could go full Weekend at Bernie's, there's no possible outcome in which Trump becomes president in 2025. The Republicans need a real candidate.
@wildgrass saidSorry, you have missed my point, both the polls and the bookmakers KNOW that they "have" changed sides, your saying otherwise is a nonsense. And his record as a president is why. Simple. And you seem confused, esp about the covid response, you appear to be talking about the Dems but using the term Trump.you are correct in saying that not a single lib would vote for Trump but how many libs will change sides and then, vote for Trump.
None. No one.
I can understand why folks like his charisma and moxie, but his record as president was abysmal. Botched the COVID response, the failed immigration plans, increased the rate of federal spending higher than Obumm ...[text shortened]... no possible outcome in which Trump becomes president in 2025. The Republicans need a real candidate.
As much as I would not bother debating whether or not Trump could win, sure as, neither could the corrupt Biden.
As stated, the more they attack him, the more their hypocrisy becomes obvious. Now I am not defending Trump in this debate, just pointing out their hypocrisy.
@averagejoe1 saidBecause, unlike you, he hasn't swallowed the idea that lying is good.
They did indeed. But in liberal-eze you do not round out your post by saying..."However, we do feel there is a need to Do What We Are Doing!! An Inquiry Into This Horrible State of Affairs with Our President's Family, Not Unlike A Mafia."
WGrass, why did you leave that out of your post? Suzianne, for instance, will say that you are sayin there is only conjecture ...[text shortened]... we can't have that , can we!! Please finish your post, you do not want AvJoe finishing your post.
@averagejoe1 saidWhy would anyone spend "spend millions" on something already "paid for"? You turkeys need to get your stories straight first.
Hmmmmm. you suggest that the repubs were travelling on skimpy knowledge.....Why did not Hillary tell them she was lying her ass off , as we watched the millions being spent on her fake paid-for dossier?
Your post is garbage dump. You will be repaid in kind if the Wimpy repubs can get their act together, but alas, I fear it is too late. I have been saying, I say a ...[text shortened]... g all of society. You will get Bezos and Musk, et al, but I will be in a bubble, you won't find me.
@wildgrass saidWe said from the beginning that it was all a nothingburger.
As laid out in the hearing, the investigation has been ongoing for 8 months. They subpoenaed bank records. The GOP lawyers poured through thousands of pages of documents.
This hearing was supposed to lay out evidence about the impeachable offenses. We got bubkus. I guess they can just keep on investigating the same thing, but it's honestly looking more and more like nothing.
These were GOP lawyers saying there was not evidence to impeach.