Go back
SS agent has history of lying:

SS agent has history of lying:

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonhouse said
@JJ-Adams
So because those aids cast indirect aspersions on TRUMP THEY are insignificant but CASSIDY, you think she lies UNDER OATH and subject to criminal liability if proven she lied, SHE is now a pariah.

Good luck with that hypocritical stance.

You zombies get dumber day by day.
democrats are ignoring the laws, there is no liability

Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonhouse said
@JJ-Adams
So because those aids cast indirect aspersions on TRUMP THEY are insignificant but CASSIDY, you think she lies UNDER OATH and subject to criminal liability if proven she lied, SHE is now a pariah.

Good luck with that hypocritical stance.

You zombies get dumber day by day.
Problem with Cassidy is the agent denies telling her any such thing, and the other agents in the car also deny it happened. .

Vote Up
Vote Down

@jj-adams said
Problem with Cassidy is the agent denies telling her any such thing, and the other agents in the car also deny it happened. .
Where? When?

They've made no public statements at all.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@jj-adams said
Problem with Cassidy is the agent denies telling her any such thing, and the other agents in the car also deny it happened. .
and her claiming to overhear someone that is usually at the whitehouse but was not there the day she overheard them

https://thefederalist.com/2022/07/01/exclusive-jim-banks-demands-white-house-surveillance-logs-to-vet-contested-j6-testimony/

Vote Up
Vote Down

@mott-the-hoople said
yes there is… I thought you were a lawyer 😂

https://time.com/6188793/trump-pardons-jan-6-explainer/

https://thehill.com/opinion/criminal-justice/534222-how-to-stop-trumps-secret-pardons/
No President has ever issued a "secret pardon" as your second article concedes. I believe they would be found invalid if ever attempted as most do most experts. https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-can-president-trump-issue-secret-pardons-1562790

Vote Up
Vote Down

@no1marauder said
Where? When?

They've made no public statements at all.
and that proves what?

cheer up, at least you learned about secret pardons today 😂

Vote Up
Vote Down

@mott-the-hoople said
and her claiming to overhear someone that is usually at the whitehouse but was not there the day she overheard them

https://thefederalist.com/2022/07/01/exclusive-jim-banks-demands-white-house-surveillance-logs-to-vet-contested-j6-testimony/
She didn't claim to "overhear someone". She claimed Ornato told her the story with Engel present.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@mott-the-hoople said
and that proves what?

cheer up, at least you learned about secret pardons today 😂
Secret pardons don't exist.

Show me where Ornato, Engel or any secret service agent contradicts her testimony in public. If they haven't (and they haven't) you guys are making claims with no basis but anonymous sources.

Vote Up
Vote Down

@sonhouse said
@Metal-Brain
So now you move the goalposts. They ONLY use the beast for POTUS BECAUSE it is bulletproof. So just getting into a toyota van is not an option but you knew that full well but just in your own uniquely incompetent manner think you are weaponizing something or other but instead you just become that much more transparent comrade.
I am pretty sure all vehicles used by the POTUS are bulletproof.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Another "he said- she said" pile of click bait and propaganda.

"Orange man bad"!!

Vote Up
Vote Down

@Metal-Brain
NOBODY said anything about Trump wanting to go to another vehicle and besides, they ALL are SS drivers and would say the same thing to Trump, too dangerous, no open route. But that doesn't matter to you since ALL you want is to get your hero Trump, well ONE of your two hero's, off the hook.