Originally posted by sasquatch672Did you find it that hard to skip STANG's threads ?
Yeah, me. I make the frickin' rules around here. Mind your business and I might go easy on you.
What was the real reason for you alerting moderators against STANG over and over again ?
Was it because you couldn't deny STANG's concerns about America's behaviour under Bush ?
Originally posted by sasquatch672I'm surprised to see you say such a thing. I thought you believed in AMERICA - LAND OF THE FREE! Why should your opinions and your free speech be of value but not Stang's?
I think if you come here, just like anywhere, you agree to a set of rules. If you break those rules, you lose your privileges. Imagine some putz at a classy restaurant - forget that, a dirt-floor bar - walking around to every patron present and saying to them, over and over, "VIOLENCE LEADS TO VIOLENCE". Do you think that person's quote-unquote "free ...[text shortened]... not to have that extra drink and just maybe not to come back?
Stang should stay gone.
You sound more and more like a commie to me.
1 edit
Originally posted by arrakisIt's only Americans that are allowed to be free. It's American free speech that matters, not other countries'.
I'm surprised to see you say such a thing. I thought you believed in AMERICA - LAND OF THE FREE! Why should your opinions and your free speech be of value but not Stang's?
You sound more and more like a commie to me.
How about, instead of moderators giving a permanent ban, the 'public' here gets to vote on whether a user gets a permanent ban or not.
Democracy in action.
Obviously this will happen only after the normal moderator procedures are followed.
If the offender is then voted off the site democratically, no-one can whine about it afterwards.