Supposition

So we know STANG works in marketing.

Let's assume that STANG is reasonably bright.

STANG, during his time at RHP, has entrenched the opinions of right-wingers and alienated a number of moderates who are baffled and annoyed by his bombardment of a chess website and claims that he is being "silenced" for political reasons when this is clearly not the case.

[b]Supposition: STANG works for the US government, and is employed to convince right-thinking people that those on the left are quite mad.

Originally posted by dottewell
So we know STANG works in marketing.

Let's assume that STANG is reasonably bright.

STANG, during his time at RHP, has entrenched the opinions of right-wingers and alienated a number of moderates who are baffled and annoyed by his bombardment of a chess website and claims that he is being "silenced" for political reasons when this is clearly not the c ...[text shortened]... ment, and is employed to convince right-thinking people that those on the left are quite mad.

Someone tell me what STANG is and what he has done.

Originally posted by dottewell
So we know STANG works in marketing.

Let's assume that STANG is reasonably bright.

STANG, during his time at RHP, has entrenched the opinions of right-wingers and alienated a number of moderates who are baffled and annoyed by his bombardment of a chess website and claims that he is being "silenced" for political reasons when this is clearly not the c ...[text shortened]... ment, and is employed to convince right-thinking people that those on the left are quite mad.

No nukes, no nukes, no nukes.

since this thread is spam, you don't mind me posting some unrelated, out of topic spam, do you?

Originally posted by catfoodtim
Its a fine line between Supposition and Suppository.