Go back
Sweden pays $34k to rid the migrants..Each!

Sweden pays $34k to rid the migrants..Each!

Debates

1 edit

@AverageJoe1 said
You mean that she does not make solid, factual statements which contribute to the issue at at hand? How about on the STR thread where she told us all what my house is like in my subdivision,....... there is no way that that lent any substance to the discussion. It is like wading through mud with these people. Look for substance fron SHouse any time now.
The disingenuous AvJoe chimes in, still not knowing what he's talking about.

You started it, genius. What a baby.


@Rajk999 said
You are the classic example of why God told His people to keep the women out of the church. You do not have the ability to be factual. You are driven by hormones and emotion, both of which are meaningless when decisions have to be made. Stay the hell out of politics too.
There is no god.
Bugger off to spirituality spanky.


@Suzianne said
Paul advised men to keep their women at home. Paul, not God. God certainly did not mean to keep the Good News about salvation away from women.

Calling you a modern day Paul is not a compliment.
I never said that women should stay at home, neither keep the good news about salvation away from women, neither did Paul ever say that.

So you are a liar, and a deceiver. You take what I said and twisted it around.

This is the kind of thing many women do, when they fail to win an argument.


@shavixmir said
There is no god.
Bugger off to spirituality spanky.
Careful, Shav, you being a guy who thinks it is OK for a govt to give stuff of other people to you and the other mistletoes.
With that, how do you think people will respect your comment that there is no God?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

@AverageJoe1
I would lose respect for a dude saying he would not respect a dude saying there is no god.


@sonhouse said
@AverageJoe1
I would lose respect for a dude saying he would not respect a dude saying there is no god.
You make my point exactly. People, like you who think it is OK to take money and assets from one person and give it to another, can hardly make a statement which would gain respect, no matter what the sentence is about.
So, it would follow that you, being one of those persons, would naturally have no respect for something that I might say. Why, that would be an oxymoron. I think that I should not hand over my stuff to you ($ money to change your gender, eg, or $25K to buy a house, or $50k to help your ill-devised business), and you think that I should hand over my money to you. (How can you even read this sentence without discomfort).

I have total respect for your not believing that I deserve your respect, since my beliefs are totally different than yours. ( I think I said that right, it is late over here!!)


@AverageJoe1 said
You make my point exactly. People, like you who think it is OK to take money and assets from one person and give it to another, can hardly make a statement which would gain respect, no matter what the sentence is about.
So, it would follow that you, being one of those persons, would naturally have no respect for something that I might say. Why, that would be an oxy ...[text shortened]... y beliefs are totally different than yours. ( I think I said that right, it is late over here!!)
When your premise is false, your argument is false.

God, I get tired of saying that.


@AverageJoe1 said
Careful, Shav, you being a guy who thinks it is OK for a govt to give stuff of other people to you and the other mistletoes.
With that, how do you think people will respect your comment that there is no God?
Someone claiming there is no God is better than some jerk bearing false witness against his neighbor.

Just my opinion.


@Rajk999 said
I never said that women should stay at home, neither keep the good news about salvation away from women, neither did Paul ever say that.

So you are a liar, and a deceiver. You take what I said and twisted it around.

This is the kind of thing many women do, when they fail to win an argument.
Give it a rest. I've heard it all before.

Deniers deny. Who knew?


You: This is the kind of thing many women do, when they fail to win an argument.

Also you: You take what I said and twisted it around.

Coincidence? Hyperbole? Hypocrisy?

Check, check, check.


@AverageJoe1 said
Careful, Shav, you being a guy who thinks it is OK for a govt to give stuff of other people to you and the other mistletoes.
With that, how do you think people will respect your comment that there is no God?
I don’t give a flying fvck.

It’s 2024, people should comprehend that gods are fairy tales from a bygone age.


@Suzianne said
When your premise is false, your argument is false.

God, I get tired of saying that.
Tired? Try paying for your neighbor's abortion. Oh lord here comes her daddy again, something about his other daughter.


@shavixmir said
I don’t give a flying fvck.

It’s 2024, people should comprehend that gods are fairy tales from a bygone age.
Shav says that he does not care (my words) that citizens are required to distribute their wealth.


@AverageJoe1 said
Shav says that he does not care (my words) that citizens are required to distribute their wealth.
Your words. Correct.
Why mention my name?

1 edit

@shavixmir said
Your words. Correct.
Why mention my name?
You said above that you 'don't give a Fly Fk'. I simply responded (as is customary on Forum) as best I could without childish boorish wording. So I replaced 'F Fk' with 'doesn't care'. You will give me the prerogative of being civil? And gentlemanly, if you will, as there is a girl on this Forum?

Mentioned your name (?) as I was responding to what you said. And my obvious reason for the post, now that that is resolved, was for people to know that there is someone among us who favors distribution of wealth. That is, if I make $500 today, and part of that money is taken by the govt and given to someone that I do not even know, for some reason that I do not even know. That is what I wanted to get out there. I could hardly let your coarse comment go unanswered, given that this is a forum of ideas. Tell us more of your ideas.

Is there something wrong?


@AverageJoe1 said
You said above that you 'don't give a Fly Fk'. I simply responded (as is customary on Forum) as best I could without childish boorish wording. So I replaced 'F Fk' with 'doesn't care'. You will give me the prerogative of being civil? And gentlemanly, if you will, as there is a girl on this Forum?

Mentioned your name (?) as I was responding to what you said. And m ...[text shortened]... ered, given that this is a forum of ideas. Tell us more of your ideas.

Is there something wrong?
You said I should be worried about people’s religious feelings. I don’t.

I don’t give a flying fvck about gods and people’s faith in antiquated fairy tales.

Sorry. Don’t give a hoot.