@mott-the-hoople saidMy question stands: Do you EVEN know what systemic racism means?
I have been waiting on someone to give me an example and what biden is doing to stop it. All I have seen is examples of biden being racist, the very thing he claims to be stopping.
There have been many examples of what he's done to blunt the effect of systemic racism. To stop it totally, he'd have to put a lot of people like you in prison.
@mott-the-hoople saidBecause UN-disenfranchised people (white people) would mob the line, insisting on getting theirs before the people it was meant to help. You know, the actually disenfranchised.
Why have a list then?
@mott-the-hoople saidThen you obviously are in favor of Ketanji Brown Jackson becoming the next Supreme Court Justice?
I think the person with the best qualifications should win. You see it as skin color…now who is the racist?
Somehow I doubt it.
@sleepyguy saidAnother white boy who just doesn't quite get what systemic racism means.
Again with the groups.
You just can't get there.
@mott-the-hoople saidOh, yeah, sure, sure.
I am against the requirements laid out for this particular seat
What you are against, is a black woman being chosen.
Admit it.
@mott-the-hoople saidAnd it looks exactly like you.
hun you have put on display what a true racist is.
@mott-the-hoople saidDo you have a good candidate from any of those groups?
why not an Asian, Hispanic, Chinese ect? See if you can give an intelligent answer to that.
Or are you just anti-black on the Southern Fried principle of it?
@shallow-blue saidYes, it is his right....
Yes. For all the racist Mott is, it's still none of anyone else's business who anyone voted for, including Mott. The secret of the ballot must be sacrosanct, or none of democracy means anything. Even including Mott.
Except this is a debate forum where all the posters constantly make clear what their positions are on every topic, including who they plan to vote for. Mott has never had any qualms about stating any opinion, including beliefs that most people would be ashamed to admit. So why back out of answering what non-white person he allegedly voted for?
Mott claimed he only cares about the "best" candidates, which to him clearly means they must at least be white. That's why he won't answer the question.
@shallow-blue saidwas just wanting to know why only blacks was the concern
Do you have a good candidate from any of those groups?
Or are you just anti-black on the Southern Fried principle of it?
@shallow-blue saidMott is not the one asking…maybe you need to direct this to the one that was 😉
Yes. For all the racist Mott is, it's still none of anyone else's business who anyone voted for, including Mott. The secret of the ballot must be sacrosanct, or none of democracy means anything. Even including Mott.
@vivify saidlike you never answered the question of why do you not include every race, you only mention blacks?
Yes, it is his right....
Except this is a debate forum where all the posters constantly make clear what their positions are on every topic, including who they plan to vote for. Mott has never had any qualms about stating any opinion, including beliefs that most people would be ashamed to admit. So why back out of answering what non-white person he allegedly voted for?
...[text shortened]... which to him clearly means they must at least be white. That's why he won't answer the question.
your racism is evident