Go back
technocratic movement

technocratic movement

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mrstabby
I think both, and more. Neither boredom or being overworked is desirable. When you say overworked, do you mean (in broad terms) the night after or in the weekend after a week's overworking?
Maybe boredom is a factor that causes escapism; after a week's hard work, people feel the need to escape the boredom of the weekend (e.g. by binge drinking). One c ...[text shortened]... escapism to avoid the reality of society or their own inadequacies in fitting in with society.
either ...

beer is cheap, liquor is cheap, jogging is free ...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
I use escapism partially because I am having trouble getting a job. However I don't blame this on "the top" - it's a problem I need to work on (i.e. improve efficiency at "the bottom" which is closer to where I am now than "the top" ).
The top have used machines to reduce labour. Now the bottom have fewer jobs to go round. I think technology has been used a bit irresponsibly - it should be used to make jobs easier, and if it is to replace the job then the process should be more gradual.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by mrstabby

The problem with the bottom is the top get to choose what they do.
Is it possible then that the difference between the two groups then is that those who want to be at the top simply recognise that the only way to get there is learn how the game is played and follow instructions. The problem with the bottom seems a reverse arrogance that sees them think that can do away with the top, and yet still aspire to better things themselves.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by kmax87
Is it possible then that the difference between the two groups then is that those who want to be at the top simply recognise that the only way to get there is learn how the game is played and follow instructions. The problem with the bottom seems a reverse arrogance that sees them think that can do away with the top, and yet still aspire to better things themselves.
Quite possible. Unfortunately there is quite an element of luck in this game, and people at the bottom might never get the opportunity to play.

Vote Up
Vote Down

something like what happens at public school education, where everyone gets to play. it seems that the existing governmental structures haven't quite got that bit working.

i don't see how you can blame that on "the top" or the middle class, tho.