@the-grifter saidThe appointment mistake of the Justice Jackson, who could not define 'woman', has been exposed. She will only get worse. Yes, the other libs voted with her.....but you see, it is her reasoning (the stock and trade of a judge) that will sink her.
just got bitch slapped by the United States supreme court ( yeah ! )
Those other two libs, and of course the other 6 judges, will heretofore regard her with disdainful surmise, maybe amounting to shunning. If so, you libs will say they should not doooooo that. No, what someone shooould to is,.she should resign.
If no one saw the bitch slapping by Judge Amy Barrett, it is worth a read. Turned Jackson inside out.
@AverageJoe1 saidShe's right, they're wrong, get over it.
The appointment mistake of the Justice Jackson, who could not define 'woman', has been exposed. She will only get worse. Yes, the other libs voted with her.....but you see, it is her reasoning (the stock and trade of a judge) that will sink her.
Those other two libs, and of course the other 6 judges, will heretofore regard her with disdainful surmise, maybe amoun ...[text shortened]... no one saw the bitch slapping by Judge Amy Barrett, it is worth a read. Turned Jackson inside out.
@Suzianne saidSuzianne. This person is a judge. They hve to read and absorb a LOT!! That is What They DO! That is the job of a judge. That is what being a judge IS!
She's right, they're wrong, get over it.
Here are two things she said. Hard for me to 'get over', I do this for a living.
"It requires too much boring legalese to analyze the law.."
AND..
"There is too much mind-numbingly technical query"
This is what a judge does. Her fellow judges (sad) looked at these 2 comments in amazement.
I would appreciate an honest response.
:
@the-grifter saidSome of these small court judges are so stupid, I can just imagine them trying to order Trump to rebuild the nuclear facilities he destroyed in Iran.
just got bitch slapped by the United States supreme court ( yeah ! )
@AverageJoe1 saidThese judges are ruled by the man who gave them a job for life.
Suzianne. This person is a judge. They hve to read and absorb a LOT!! That is What They DO! That is the job of a judge. That is what being a judge IS!
Here are two things she said. Hard for me to 'get over', I do this for a living.
"It requires too much boring legalese to analyze the law.."
AND..
"There is too much mind-numbingly technical query"
Thi ...[text shortened]... judges (sad) looked at these 2 comments in amazement.
I would appreciate an honest response.
:
@AverageJoe1 saidThe last three (before Jackson) were made justices for the express purpose of overturning Roe v. Wade. Their only job description is voting for Trump's nonsense.
Sorry.
Your comment is conflicting, as you suggest she is subject to Trump for giving her the job, yet she has just ruled against him. You see how your posts fall flat.
You're wrong, and they're wrong.
@AverageJoe1 saidShouldn't anyone running for POTUS be familiar with our Constitution and the Bill of Rights?
Suzianne. This person is a judge. They hve to read and absorb a LOT!! That is What They DO! That is the job of a judge. That is what being a judge IS!
It's not as if they are applying to be a customer-service agent at a retail store or a fast-food restaurant, right? -- and it's also a rather long application process, isn't it?
@AverageJoe1 saidIf you ever become capable of pregnancy, perhaps you would then have understanding and proper legal standing to comment on this issue.
Lord, not Roe v Wade again. Write to sonhouse
Also: if that does somehow occur, please be careful not to wade among the roe -- no telling what might happen.
@Arkturos saidLOL jumped straight from judge to president...
Shouldn't anyone running for POTUS be familiar with our Constitution and the Bill of Rights?
It's not as if they are applying to be a customer-service agent at a retail store or a fast-food restaurant, right? -- and it's also a rather long application process, isn't it?
1 edit
@Arkturos saidyou write like a liberal. yes she is familiar with the law. I don't know why you said that, except usual lib smartass,....
Shouldn't anyone running for POTUS be familiar with our Constitution and the Bill of Rights?
It's not as if they are applying to be a customer-service agent at a retail store or a fast-food restaurant, right? -- and it's also a rather long application process, isn't it?
but she SAID.."It requires too much boring legal-ese to analyze the law".
She ALSO said "it requires 'too much techincal query".
She is a lazy good-for -nothing, so now because of this Biden minion, we have a court where the other 8 judges will look down on her, solely because she is not in their league. They know it, and she knows it, but that she knows it...no one gives a damn.
Pick it up. Don't be like these others.
@Arkturos saidComment? Like I said, write to sonhouse. You a child?
If you ever become capable of pregnancy, perhaps you would then have understanding and proper legal standing to comment on this issue.
Also: if that does somehow occur, please be careful not to wade among the roe -- no telling what might happen.