Go back
the  Fed's Buying Spree (mortgages)

the Fed's Buying Spree (mortgages)

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

Newsweek, Feb. 1, 2010, p. 10.

The Fed's Buying Spree

Over the last year, the Fed has bought $900 billion of mortgages, giving a nice kick to the housing sector. It plans to stop in March. Is that a good or bad idea?

Lawrence Yun, chief economist, National Association of Realtors: Bad. ...

Karl Case, cofounder of Case-Shiller Index: Good. ...

Our Verdict: At some point, it's time to take off the Band-Aid. The Fed has done all it can to prop up housing, and this seems the right support to remove. By March the Fed will own $1 trillion of mortgages, including 70 percent of those issued by Fannie and Freddie. Enough is enough.

Vote Up
Vote Down

😵

"Lawrence Yun, chief economist, National Association of Realtors: Bad. ... "

Vote Up
Vote Down

there goes telerion's house value!

and theories of recovery ... whoosh! ...

what happens when the govt has to turn off the outgoing teats?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
there goes telerion's house value!

and theories of recovery ... whoosh! ...

what happens when the govt has to turn off the outgoing teats?
Tea Parties will become more "festive".

All those people who want Big Gummint to get out of the way will become angry after Big Gummint does precisely that.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Almost anybody else and we could have an interesting conversation on the Fed's balance sheet, quantitative easing, and the risks and rewards of their recent deviation from orthodox monetary instruments. Unfortunately, you've continually proven yourself to be a waste of any reasonable person's time so I'll let it go.

Vote Up
Vote Down

said telerion, tired of looosing ...

Vote Up
Vote Down

government-funded mortgage market, the next E-bomb!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
there goes telerion's house value!

and theories of recovery ... whoosh! ...

what happens when the govt has to turn off the outgoing teats?
You completely missed the point of the policy.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
You completely missed the point of the policy.
expound

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
expound
Stopping the vicious circle of default and house price falls. The question may be asked whether now is the right moment to let go of the temporary crutches, but the theory that the recovery is in motion is consistent with this being a good moment to start letting go.

Vote Up
Vote Down

why would you think that i "completely missed the point of the policy"? how do you get that from the above?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
why would you think that i "completely missed the point of the policy"? how do you get that from the above?
It's evident from the fact that you think that the policy has something to say about "theories of recovery". But I don't expect you to understand what your comments entail.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
It's evident from the fact that you think that the policy has something to say about "theories of recovery". But I don't expect you to understand what your comments entail.
where did i say the POLICY has something to say about "theories of recovery"?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zeeblebot
where did i say the POLICY has something to say about "theories of recovery"?
Here:

and theories of recovery ... whoosh! ...

what happens when the govt has to turn off the outgoing teats?


But again, I don't expect you to understand your own posts considering the amount of copying and pasting that are usually involved.

Vote Up
Vote Down

are you assuming the policy is going to work?