Go back
The Lessons Of Ur

The Lessons Of Ur

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

Six thousand years before Christ there was a city. Now it would be called the "war zone". Then it was called the first war zone.

The city of Ur kind of summarizes all that we have been and done. It became a huge pile of bricks that the centuries covered with sand.

It lies at the mouth of the Euphraides river in what we now call Iraq.

Eight thousand years ago, it was a sea port. The climate of earth was much warmer then than now. Ur is now 70 miles from the sea. But then, it was a port.

The first instance of organized nation occured at Ur. A chief arose. This was a new idea. He conquored two neighboring villages. Thus we became "man".

2 edits
Vote Up
Vote Down

There was a king. Who came five and a half centuries later.

He was Sargon. He lived about 2330 BC to 2275 BC. Or 1334 BC to 2279 BC. Depending on your "educational bias".

I know. Sounds like science fiction. But it is true.

He was the first "real" king. Because now we have language. Written language. Not just broken shards of flint and stone at the sight of the real first kings battle.

Sargon ruled Ur. And the nation called mesopotamia. Seven villages who owed allegience to Sargon. Government is born. It is the first recorded. That is important.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Why did Sargon rule?

Because he "conquored" seven villages and told them he ruled. By force of arms. And a mighty army of four hundred warriors.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by StarValleyWy
Why did Sargon rule?

Because he "conquored" seven villages and told them he ruled. By force of arms. And a mighty army of four hundred warriors.
Sargon was not just a king and conquoror. He was the son of Shem. A Semite. We see him as the First King. Though he wasn't. By many thousand years.

See what language does? It gives one power. And a life beyond totallity.

That is the nature of language. It is why we must love it. Employ it to our reason. Use it and never abuse it. If we love truth.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Sargons father was not known. He was a bastard.

His mother, in the temple of power, did weave his basket and set him free on the Euphrades. To be discovered and reared of poor parents. To come to power as was his right.

See what language does? How it repeats? And gains power with each rehearsal?

Vote Up
Vote Down

2000 years ago the romans ruled a great empire because they conquered other civilisations, some 500 years later it began to fall apart, whats your point ?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Jay Peatea
2000 years ago the romans ruled a great empire because they conquered other civilisations, some 500 years later it began to fall apart, whats your point ?
No point.

That would be cheating the lesson of time.

Only the lesson matters.

Vote Up
Vote Down

The language says that Zababa tried to oppose our man. Our king.

But the inlil opposed the attempt. What does it matter to us? What is an "enlil" to us?

Zapata tried to kill Sargon. Why? To what did the attempt want?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Enter the pretty girl. Inanna.

Why did she send her hero to the evil Lugalzagesi, king of Uruk?

To be killed. Why? Because of deceipt? Or love?

If love? what did she love?

Vote Up
Vote Down

But Sargon does the unexpected. Instead of going, he wages war and wins. Hmmm...

This is the first time in language that we have a heroic victory. Why? What lesson can we draw?

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Lugalzagesi just thought small. He went village to village and killed for what he wanted.

Sargon just killed Lugalzagesi and took what he had taken.

Smart. To the point. Modern. Usurpation. Pure and to the point.

Vote Up
Vote Down

You are a madman SVW. But God bless you for it.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by darvlay
You are a madman SVW. But God bless you for it.
Think you, I thank.

snirk... ain't beer a gift? the Sumer gave us that too.

Vote Up
Vote Down

But then he met the end. He marched all the way to turkey. Conquoring villages and cities.

But he failed. Do you know why?

Because he lacked the military might to enforce his march.

To march and conquor is one thing. To then post troops to enforce slavery is another. He failed. Oh well. It is written. for the very first time.

So what? Well. We can start reading and understanding all the slavery and trecherous deeds to come. That... my friends is why we are not animals. We can learn. If we will.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by StarValleyWy
That... my friends is why we are not animals. We can learn. If we will.
Can individual humans learn? Sure. Can the collective?
I haven't seen any evidence of it since the inception of language.

Note that sociology and psychology both have a great deal of
difficulty predicting the behavior of an individual but are
rather reasonable at predicting communities.

When you say 'we can learn. If we will,' I say,
it depends on the definition of 'we.' If you mean you and me,
I'd say, no problem. If you mean humanity, I'd say, 'Couldn't
prove it.'

Nemesio