Six thousand years before Christ there was a city. Now it would be called the "war zone". Then it was called the first war zone.
The city of Ur kind of summarizes all that we have been and done. It became a huge pile of bricks that the centuries covered with sand.
It lies at the mouth of the Euphraides river in what we now call Iraq.
Eight thousand years ago, it was a sea port. The climate of earth was much warmer then than now. Ur is now 70 miles from the sea. But then, it was a port.
The first instance of organized nation occured at Ur. A chief arose. This was a new idea. He conquored two neighboring villages. Thus we became "man".
There was a king. Who came five and a half centuries later.
He was Sargon. He lived about 2330 BC to 2275 BC. Or 1334 BC to 2279 BC. Depending on your "educational bias".
I know. Sounds like science fiction. But it is true.
He was the first "real" king. Because now we have language. Written language. Not just broken shards of flint and stone at the sight of the real first kings battle.
Sargon ruled Ur. And the nation called mesopotamia. Seven villages who owed allegience to Sargon. Government is born. It is the first recorded. That is important.
Originally posted by StarValleyWySargon was not just a king and conquoror. He was the son of Shem. A Semite. We see him as the First King. Though he wasn't. By many thousand years.
Why did Sargon rule?
Because he "conquored" seven villages and told them he ruled. By force of arms. And a mighty army of four hundred warriors.
See what language does? It gives one power. And a life beyond totallity.
That is the nature of language. It is why we must love it. Employ it to our reason. Use it and never abuse it. If we love truth.
But then he met the end. He marched all the way to turkey. Conquoring villages and cities.
But he failed. Do you know why?
Because he lacked the military might to enforce his march.
To march and conquor is one thing. To then post troops to enforce slavery is another. He failed. Oh well. It is written. for the very first time.
So what? Well. We can start reading and understanding all the slavery and trecherous deeds to come. That... my friends is why we are not animals. We can learn. If we will.
Originally posted by StarValleyWyCan individual humans learn? Sure. Can the collective?
That... my friends is why we are not animals. We can learn. If we will.
I haven't seen any evidence of it since the inception of language.
Note that sociology and psychology both have a great deal of
difficulty predicting the behavior of an individual but are
rather reasonable at predicting communities.
When you say 'we can learn. If we will,' I say,
it depends on the definition of 'we.' If you mean you and me,
I'd say, no problem. If you mean humanity, I'd say, 'Couldn't
prove it.'
Nemesio