14 Mar '15 13:37>
There is lots to think about here, but this stands out for me
'In a sense, by calling a crime against humanity "banal", she was trying to point to the way in which the crime had become for the criminals accepted, routinised, and implemented without moral revulsion and political indignation and resistance.'
'Indeed, her indictment of Eichmann reached beyond the man to the historical world in which true thinking was vanishing and, as a result, crimes against humanity became increasingly "thinkable". The degradation of thinking worked hand in hand with the systematic destruction of populations.'
'He invoked "duty" in an effort to explain his own version of Kantianism.'
The first and third sentences seem to describe how violence can be normalized and legitimized by duty to the cause, it is the second sentence which for me really asks an important question. Under all circumstances are we expected to think about our actions , because the results if we don't are truly dreadful.
'In a sense, by calling a crime against humanity "banal", she was trying to point to the way in which the crime had become for the criminals accepted, routinised, and implemented without moral revulsion and political indignation and resistance.'
'Indeed, her indictment of Eichmann reached beyond the man to the historical world in which true thinking was vanishing and, as a result, crimes against humanity became increasingly "thinkable". The degradation of thinking worked hand in hand with the systematic destruction of populations.'
'He invoked "duty" in an effort to explain his own version of Kantianism.'
The first and third sentences seem to describe how violence can be normalized and legitimized by duty to the cause, it is the second sentence which for me really asks an important question. Under all circumstances are we expected to think about our actions , because the results if we don't are truly dreadful.