Go back
The paradox of non-scientifical debate

The paradox of non-scientifical debate

Debates

P
Upward Spiral

Halfway

Joined
02 Aug 04
Moves
8702
Clock
11 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

The simpler the question, the more diverging will the answers be. Moreover, the lower the probability of finding some middle ground.

Evidence 1: Thread 91554

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
Clock
11 Apr 08
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
The simpler the question, the more diverging will the answers be. Moreover, the lower the probability of finding some middle ground.

Evidence 1: Thread 91554
The same can be said about pseudo-scientific debates too.

There are people that think that their opinion is a well founded scientific fact. (Like the astrologers as one example.)
And people who says that science is not more than religion. Often because they don't understand the science.

AThousandYoung
1st Dan TKD Kukkiwon

tinyurl.com/2te6yzdu

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26748
Clock
12 Apr 08
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
The simpler the question, the more diverging will the answers be. Moreover, the lower the probability of finding some middle ground.

Evidence 1: Thread 91554
My answer is grounded in science! Of course, the science in question is not economics, psychology or sociology.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.