Go back
The paradox of non-scientifical debate

The paradox of non-scientifical debate

Debates

Vote Up
Vote Down

The simpler the question, the more diverging will the answers be. Moreover, the lower the probability of finding some middle ground.

Evidence 1: Thread 91554

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
The simpler the question, the more diverging will the answers be. Moreover, the lower the probability of finding some middle ground.

Evidence 1: Thread 91554
The same can be said about pseudo-scientific debates too.

There are people that think that their opinion is a well founded scientific fact. (Like the astrologers as one example.)
And people who says that science is not more than religion. Often because they don't understand the science.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Palynka
The simpler the question, the more diverging will the answers be. Moreover, the lower the probability of finding some middle ground.

Evidence 1: Thread 91554
My answer is grounded in science! Of course, the science in question is not economics, psychology or sociology.