Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Debates Forum

Debates Forum

  1. 25 Jan '18 19:24 / 1 edit
    DOJ not wanting released to the public until they see it...LOL
    Hey DOJ...YOU are the subject of these crimes, nice try though.


    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01/25/republicans-full-steam-ahead-on-surveillance-memo-release-despite-doj-rebuke.html



    Missing texts found...FBI must not be good at recovering or hiding...which is it?

    http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/370711-justice-department-recovers-missing-fbi-agents-text-messages
  2. 25 Jan '18 21:10
    Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
    DOJ not wanting released to the public until they see it...LOL
    Hey DOJ...YOU are the subject of these crimes, nice try though.


    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01/25/republicans-full-steam-ahead-on-surveillance-memo-release-despite-doj-rebuke.html



    Missing texts found...FBI must not be good at recovering or hiding...which is it?

    h ...[text shortened]... .com/homenews/administration/370711-justice-department-recovers-missing-fbi-agents-text-messages
    Now we're supposed to do away with the Justice dept. the FBI, and our judiciary just because Trump doesn't like them? It's not gonna happen skippy
  3. 25 Jan '18 21:40
    Originally posted by @mchill
    Now we're supposed to do away with the Justice dept. the FBI, and our judiciary just because Trump doesn't like them? It's not gonna happen skippy
    Loretta Lynch, the head of the DOJ, met secretly with Bill Clinton before the investigation was over. Do you approve of this?

    Also, it has been shown that the FBI exonerated Hillary before the investigation began.

    Considering these facts, how can anyone consider either organization to have any credibility whatsoever?
  4. 25 Jan '18 21:41
    Originally posted by @mchill
    Now we're supposed to do away with the Justice dept. the FBI, and our judiciary just because Trump doesn't like them? It's not gonna happen skippy
    Not because Trump doesn't like them, because some have became corrupt thanks to Obama and dnc. But you know that. You are just a sleazy liberal being sad because your charade is about to end.
  5. Subscriber no1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    25 Jan '18 22:00
    Originally posted by @whodey
    Loretta Lynch, the head of the DOJ, met secretly with Bill Clinton before the investigation was over. Do you approve of this?

    Also, it has been shown that the FBI exonerated Hillary before the investigation began.

    Considering these facts, how can anyone consider either organization to have any credibility whatsoever?
    As you surely know, neither of those statements are true.

    You talking about "credibility" gets a LMAO!
  6. Subscriber no1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    25 Jan '18 22:01
    Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
    DOJ not wanting released to the public until they see it...LOL
    Hey DOJ...YOU are the subject of these crimes, nice try though.


    http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01/25/republicans-full-steam-ahead-on-surveillance-memo-release-despite-doj-rebuke.html



    Missing texts found...FBI must not be good at recovering or hiding...which is it?

    h ...[text shortened]... .com/homenews/administration/370711-justice-department-recovers-missing-fbi-agents-text-messages
    What "crimes"?

    Will the Democratic memo, which shows the misleading and incomplete nature of the Nunes' memo, be released as well?
  7. 25 Jan '18 22:03
    Originally posted by @no1marauder
    What "crimes"?

    Will the Democratic memo, which shows the misleading and incomplete nature of the Nunes' memo, be released as well?
    What "misleading and incomplete nature" ?
  8. Subscriber no1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    25 Jan '18 22:08
    Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
    What "misleading and incomplete nature" ?
    People familiar with the memo said it centers on a fall 2016 application for a FISA warrant targeting Carter Page, a onetime member of the Trump presidential campaign who had recently visited Russia. The memo is said to stress that the application used information from a former British intelligence agent, Christopher Steele, without adequately explaining to the judge that his research was financed by Democrats.

    But people familiar with the underlying application have portrayed the Republican memo as misleading in part because Mr. Steele’s information, which was also compiled into a notorious dossier, was insufficient to meet the standard for a FISA warrant. The application, they said, drew on other intelligence that the Republican memo misleadingly omits — but revealing that other information to rebut the memo would risk blowing other sources and methods of intelligence-gathering about Russia.

    https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/24/us/politics/devin-nunes-fbi-russia.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
  9. 25 Jan '18 22:23
    Originally posted by @no1marauder
    People familiar with the memo said it centers on a fall 2016 application for a FISA warrant targeting Carter Page, a onetime member of the Trump presidential campaign who had recently visited Russia. The memo is said to stress that the application used information from a former British intelligence agent, Christopher Steele, without adequately explainin ...[text shortened]... pe=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region&region=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
    When the actual memo is displayed holler back. NYT and their anonymous sources. (eyeroll)
  10. Subscriber no1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    25 Jan '18 22:35 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
    When the actual memo is displayed holler back. NYT and their anonymous sources. (eyeroll)
    You want to accept what Nunes says hook, line and sinker because it's politically useful (according to the Boyd letter, he hasn't even read most of the materials).

    Sure, release their dumbass memo (the one written by partisan hacks); then release the Democratic memo (ditto), then declassify all the information that actually went into the FISA warrant request.

    A few of our intelligence assets might be compromised, but who cares?

    DOJ should seriously consider telling the Committee to GFI; they are trying to obstruct an ongoing criminal investigation which has already produced guilty pleas and indictments. A Congressional Committee seeking texts from investigators during a criminal investigation regarding that investigation in order to impede it is unprecedented and surely illegal.
  11. 25 Jan '18 23:07
    Originally posted by @no1marauder
    You want to accept what Nunes says hook, line and sinker because it's politically useful (according to the Boyd letter, he hasn't even read most of the materials).

    Sure, release their dumbass memo (the one written by partisan hacks); then release the Democratic memo (ditto), then declassify all the information that actually went into the FISA warrant ...[text shortened]... n [b]regarding that investigation
    in order to impede it is unprecedented and surely illegal.[/b]
    "guilty pleas and indictments"

    You already tried that lie...I called you on it!
  12. Subscriber no1marauder
    Humble and Kind
    25 Jan '18 23:18
    Originally posted by @mott-the-hoople
    "guilty pleas and indictments"

    You already tried that lie...I called you on it!
    It's a complete puzzle why you insist things are "lies" when they are well-known and undeniable.

    The Russian Collusion investigation has already produced two guilty pleas and at least two other indictments. You screaming that is a "lie" does not change those facts.
  13. 26 Jan '18 02:09 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by @no1marauder
    It's a complete puzzle why you insist things are "lies" when they are well-known and undeniable.

    The Russian Collusion investigation has already produced two guilty pleas and at least two other indictments. You screaming that is a "lie" does not change those facts.
    But you are implying they are connected to Trump. Are they? Manafort has brought an overreach lawsuit.