- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147487
DOJ not wanting released to the public until they see it...LOL
Hey DOJ...YOU are the subject of these crimes, nice try though.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01/25/republicans-full-steam-ahead-on-surveillance-memo-release-despite-doj-rebuke.html
Missing texts found...FBI must not be good at recovering or hiding...which is it?
http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/370711-justice-department-recovers-missing-fbi-agents-text-messages
25 Jan 18
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleNow we're supposed to do away with the Justice dept. the FBI, and our judiciary just because Trump doesn't like them? It's not gonna happen skippy
DOJ not wanting released to the public until they see it...LOL
Hey DOJ...YOU are the subject of these crimes, nice try though.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01/25/republicans-full-steam-ahead-on-surveillance-memo-release-despite-doj-rebuke.html
Missing texts found...FBI must not be good at recovering or hiding...which is it?
h ...[text shortened]... .com/homenews/administration/370711-justice-department-recovers-missing-fbi-agents-text-messages
25 Jan 18
Originally posted by @mchillLoretta Lynch, the head of the DOJ, met secretly with Bill Clinton before the investigation was over. Do you approve of this?
Now we're supposed to do away with the Justice dept. the FBI, and our judiciary just because Trump doesn't like them? It's not gonna happen skippy
Also, it has been shown that the FBI exonerated Hillary before the investigation began.
Considering these facts, how can anyone consider either organization to have any credibility whatsoever?
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147487
25 Jan 18
Originally posted by @mchillNot because Trump doesn't like them, because some have became corrupt thanks to Obama and dnc. But you know that. You are just a sleazy liberal being sad because your charade is about to end.
Now we're supposed to do away with the Justice dept. the FBI, and our judiciary just because Trump doesn't like them? It's not gonna happen skippy
25 Jan 18
Originally posted by @whodeyAs you surely know, neither of those statements are true.
Loretta Lynch, the head of the DOJ, met secretly with Bill Clinton before the investigation was over. Do you approve of this?
Also, it has been shown that the FBI exonerated Hillary before the investigation began.
Considering these facts, how can anyone consider either organization to have any credibility whatsoever?
You talking about "credibility" gets a LMAO!
25 Jan 18
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleWhat "crimes"?
DOJ not wanting released to the public until they see it...LOL
Hey DOJ...YOU are the subject of these crimes, nice try though.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/01/25/republicans-full-steam-ahead-on-surveillance-memo-release-despite-doj-rebuke.html
Missing texts found...FBI must not be good at recovering or hiding...which is it?
h ...[text shortened]... .com/homenews/administration/370711-justice-department-recovers-missing-fbi-agents-text-messages
Will the Democratic memo, which shows the misleading and incomplete nature of the Nunes' memo, be released as well?
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147487
25 Jan 18
Originally posted by @no1marauderWhat "misleading and incomplete nature" ?
What "crimes"?
Will the Democratic memo, which shows the misleading and incomplete nature of the Nunes' memo, be released as well?
25 Jan 18
Originally posted by @mott-the-hooplePeople familiar with the memo said it centers on a fall 2016 application for a FISA warrant targeting Carter Page, a onetime member of the Trump presidential campaign who had recently visited Russia. The memo is said to stress that the application used information from a former British intelligence agent, Christopher Steele, without adequately explaining to the judge that his research was financed by Democrats.
What "misleading and incomplete nature" ?
But people familiar with the underlying application have portrayed the Republican memo as misleading in part because Mr. Steele’s information, which was also compiled into a notorious dossier, was insufficient to meet the standard for a FISA warrant. The application, they said, drew on other intelligence that the Republican memo misleadingly omits — but revealing that other information to rebut the memo would risk blowing other sources and methods of intelligence-gathering about Russia.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/24/us/politics/devin-nunes-fbi-russia.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147487
25 Jan 18
Originally posted by @no1marauderWhen the actual memo is displayed holler back. NYT and their anonymous sources. (eyeroll)
People familiar with the memo said it centers on a fall 2016 application for a FISA warrant targeting Carter Page, a onetime member of the Trump presidential campaign who had recently visited Russia. The memo is said to stress that the application used information from a former British intelligence agent, Christopher Steele, without adequately explainin ...[text shortened]... pe=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleYou want to accept what Nunes says hook, line and sinker because it's politically useful (according to the Boyd letter, he hasn't even read most of the materials).
When the actual memo is displayed holler back. NYT and their anonymous sources. (eyeroll)
Sure, release their dumbass memo (the one written by partisan hacks); then release the Democratic memo (ditto), then declassify all the information that actually went into the FISA warrant request.
A few of our intelligence assets might be compromised, but who cares?
DOJ should seriously consider telling the Committee to GFI; they are trying to obstruct an ongoing criminal investigation which has already produced guilty pleas and indictments. A Congressional Committee seeking texts from investigators during a criminal investigation regarding that investigation in order to impede it is unprecedented and surely illegal.
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147487
25 Jan 18
Originally posted by @no1marauder"guilty pleas and indictments"
You want to accept what Nunes says hook, line and sinker because it's politically useful (according to the Boyd letter, he hasn't even read most of the materials).
Sure, release their dumbass memo (the one written by partisan hacks); then release the Democratic memo (ditto), then declassify all the information that actually went into the FISA warrant ...[text shortened]... n [b]regarding that investigation in order to impede it is unprecedented and surely illegal.[/b]
You already tried that lie...I called you on it!
25 Jan 18
Originally posted by @mott-the-hoopleIt's a complete puzzle why you insist things are "lies" when they are well-known and undeniable.
"guilty pleas and indictments"
You already tried that lie...I called you on it!
The Russian Collusion investigation has already produced two guilty pleas and at least two other indictments. You screaming that is a "lie" does not change those facts.
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 147487
Originally posted by @no1marauderBut you are implying they are connected to Trump. Are they? Manafort has brought an overreach lawsuit.
It's a complete puzzle why you insist things are "lies" when they are well-known and undeniable.
The Russian Collusion investigation has already produced two guilty pleas and at least two other indictments. You screaming that is a "lie" does not change those facts.