The post that was quoted here has been removedYes, I see the truth of this. Arizona representation in the US Senate and US House has been historically overwhelmingly white. We have more Hispanic representatives now than ever, but it is still overwhelmingly white. We also have a lot of dark money in Arizona, so this may be the main reason for this.
And the main concern for the AZ State Legislature right now seems to be a complete erosion and abrogation of voting rights for non-white voters.
Do liberals lie...? Do bears poop in the woods?
Let's look at today's liberal lie from the New York Times, the lying-est rag in America.
--------------------------------------
"If you think about the four youngest states — Arizona, New Mexico,
Alaska and Hawaii — you may notice a pattern. Like Puerto Rico and
Washington, they are home to a lot of nonwhite people, which is
not a coincidence. This country has historically been slow to grant
full enfranchisement to people with darker skin."
--------------------------------------------------
Gee, it couldn't have been that Alaska and Hawaii were not even US possessions until 1867 and 1898 respectively, could it? 🤔 🤔
My state, Massachusetts, 6th into the union, entered in 1788. And y'all actually wonder
why Hawaii and Alaska did not come in at that time?? Ho LEE. You need help, Libby.
And what about the extremely WHITE states of North Dakota(1889), Montana (1889), Oregon(1889), which passed laws banning African Americans. How come it took those VERY WHITE STATES so long to enter the union? (sorry I have to shout but I am dealing with slow racists)
Gee, you think their late entry had something to do with the land not being settled by AMERICANS for a long time?
And this, my friends is why EoT calls them "liberal liars". 😉 😉
@earl-of-trumps saidI think you're having some kind of hissy fit over nothing here.
Do liberals lie...? Do bears poop in the woods?
Let's look at today's liberal lie from the New York Times, the lying-est rag in America.
--------------------------------------
[i]
"If you think about the four youngest states — Arizona, New Mexico,
Alaska and Hawaii — you may notice a pattern. Like Puerto Rico and
Washington, they are home to a lot of nonwhite ...[text shortened]... d by AMERICANS for a long time?
And this, my friends is why EoT calls them "liberal liars". 😉 😉
Anyone with a brain knows the westward expansion of the US took some time. Can't really tell what you're on about here.
@suzianne saidI'm glad you agree, as reason can get you that correct view.
I think you're having some kind of hissy fit over nothing here.
Anyone with a brain knows the westward expansion of the US took some time. Can't really tell what you're on about here.
What I am pointing out is, the NYT claims that the last 4 states to enter the union
entered so late because the congress was dubious about letting in states with all those ta ta darkies.
Hey! They printed it, Suzie. The proud - or should I say arrogant, New York Times, pushing the race agenda.
@Duchess64 The real reason is that the US government wished to avoid or postpone granting
voting rights to Hawaii's large proportion of non-white people.
-----------
Liar.
Racist.
