Originally posted by jlillyHow do you feel about homeless people breeding? Will you give a home to their children? What about the grandkids?
So, no other intelligent thought from you?
How do you feel about the fact that homeless people in the US could have had a place to live?
You cannot win against exponential population growth!
Of course the first way to avoid this while maintaining your self-righteousness is not to try to take care of them at all, but instead demand others do so. This doesn't solve the problem of homelessness, but it does solve the problem of how you can maintain your condescending arrogance without having to actually provide homes for the homeless.
If you're really good, like shav, you can self-righteously demand others house the homeless while shamelessly bragging about how you're a thief with a sense of entitlement but without a work ethic...and still think you're part of the moral elite.
Originally posted by AThousandYoung
How do you feel about homeless people breeding? Will you give a home to their children? What about the grandkids?
You cannot win against exponential population growth!
You sure sound a bit like that ol guy Adolf.
Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Of course the first way to avoid this while maintaining your self-righteousness is not to try to take care of them at all, but instead demand others do so. This doesn't solve the problem of homelessness, but it does solve the problem of how you can maintain your condescending arrogance without having to actually provide homes for the homeless.
If you're really good, like shav, you can self-righteously demand others house the homeless while shamelessly bragging about how you're a thief with a sense of entitlement but without a work ethic...and still think you're part of the moral elite.
Did you attempt to sound worldly and intelligent here? You failed because its a rambling mess.
Originally posted by jlillyDo you know what exponential growth means? By the comments you have posted in your profile you apear to be rather naive.
Originally posted by AThousandYoung
You cannot win against exponential population growth!
You sure sound a bit like that ol guy Adolf.
Of course the first way to avoid this while maintaining your self-righteousness is not to try to take care of them at all, but instead demand others do so. This doesn't solve the problem of homeless d you attempt to sound worldly and intelligent here? You failed because its a rambling mess.
Originally posted by jlillyWhat an idiotic rant. "Affordable housing" is what got us into this mess in the first place. Contrary to what Democrats say, everyone does not deserve a house. For instance, if you're only earning $9 an hour, chances are, you're not going to be able to afford a house. Moreover, it's just not the government's role to give everybody a house. Some people simply should just be renters.
The mortgage crisis has caused a "glut" of vacant homes in the U.S. But as Petrino DiLeo explains, under the free-market system, those homes are more likely to be destroyed than provided to the homeless.
IT'S NO secret that one of the key problems in the U.S. housing market is that there are more houses for sale than buyers for them. Because of the mortgag ...[text shortened]...
http://socialistworker.org/2008/07/22/no-profit-housing-homeless
Originally posted by jlillyI win this thread by Godwin's Law.
Originally posted by AThousandYoung
[b]How do you feel about homeless people breeding? Will you give a home to their children? What about the grandkids?
You cannot win against exponential population growth!
You sure sound a bit like that ol guy Adolf.
Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Of course the first way to avoid this ...[text shortened]... d you attempt to sound worldly and intelligent here? You failed because its a rambling mess.