20 Nov '16 21:31>1 edit
Originally posted by mchillAs I pointed out, Oregon does not fit your criteria. Oregon suffers from its taxes and over regulation. Oregon is not a paradox. Oregon under performs and it is quite obvious.
What do you mean, So much for the West Coast Paradox??
If higher taxes, more government and higher wages are so bad for business, why are jobs not fleeing the west coast?? Why is it so easy to get a good paying job on the west coast, while other parts of the country struggle? Why is the standard of living higher on the west coast?
It seems there are lots of holes in your little theory.
Oregon's unemployment rate ranks right below Alabama, how proud you must be of all those help wanted signs.
California under performs as well. You might want to look at this link: http://uscommonsense.org/research/unsustainable-california-the-top-10-issues-facing-the-golden-state-wall-of-debt/
California has many natural resources going for it which includes its climate and beaches.
As has been pointed out by a liberal in this thread isn't it unusual that all the rich areas are rich due to big business. In the poor areas it requires oil. In areas that have other things going for it, they are rich because of those other things.