So the WHO is paying some independent people to investigate it's handling of covid. No issue here . Next time I lie I will pay someone to investigate me.
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/world/2020/07/former-prime-minister-helen-clark-to-lead-world-health-organization-review-of-how-world-handled-covid-19.html
@gareth-cobb saidBetter than the USA handled it, that's for damned sure.
So the WHO is paying some independent people to investigate it's handling of covid. No issue here . Next time I lie I will pay someone to investigate me.
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/world/2020/07/former-prime-minister-helen-clark-to-lead-world-health-organization-review-of-how-world-handled-covid-19.html
1 edit
@gareth-cobb saidExternal audits and/or reviews are quite commonplace in both government and industry.
So the WHO is paying some independent people to investigate it's handling of covid. No issue here . Next time I lie I will pay someone to investigate me.
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/world/2020/07/former-prime-minister-helen-clark-to-lead-world-health-organization-review-of-how-world-handled-covid-19.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/External_auditor
Glad to have informed you on this matter.
@kazetnagorra saidInternal auditting is also very common.
External audits and/or reviews are quite commonplace in both government and industry.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/External_auditor
Glad to have informed you on this matter.
@kazetnagorra saidBut its not a completely independent investigation. That needs to be completed by a third party not receiving financial compensation from the auditee. In short, if something was uncovered that was going to destroy the already dismal credibility of the WHO, it will never see the light of day. This is just PR damage control.
External audits and/or reviews are quite commonplace in both government and industry.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/External_auditor
Glad to have informed you on this matter.
@gareth-cobb saidIt's all about the money and when Tedros, who was on the take from China,
So the WHO is paying some independent people to investigate it's handling of covid. No issue here . Next time I lie I will pay someone to investigate me.
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/world/2020/07/former-prime-minister-helen-clark-to-lead-world-health-organization-review-of-how-world-handled-covid-19.html
realized that Big Donor to WHO, the USA, was withdrawing membership
and dues, he must have crapped himself LOL
Just say NO to WHO
@joe-shmo saidWho should pay for it?
But its not a completely independent investigation. That needs to be completed by a third party not receiving financial compensation from the auditee. In short, if something was uncovered that was going to destroy the already dismal credibility of the WHO, it will never see the light of day. This is just PR damage control.
2 edits
@kazetnagorra saidI imagine the governments that fund them have two options. Pay for an independent investigation, or, if the juice isn't worth the squeeze, just withdrawal funding.
Who should pay for it?
@kazetnagorra saidWord games?
I see. So instead of those who fund the WHO paying for it, it should be those who fund the WHO?
Once the WHO has acquired funding, the funding for an "external audit" of the WHO itself is provided by the WHO itself, not those who funded the WHO.
If the WHO is party A, The "External Auditors" party B, And The Governments that Fund the WHO party C.
The investigation contracts and deliverables are between party A and party B in this circumstance. For impartiality and full disclosure the contracts and deliverables for the investigation of party A need to be between party C and party B.
@kazetnagorra saidHold your breath I am tring to think of someone everyone trusts
Who should pay for it?
@gareth-cobb saidLike ignoring the problem until it was obvious it was already here. You don't shut the barn door after the horse is out.
Like telling Trump not to close the border 😵
@joe-shmo saidYou mean it should be someone getting financial compensation from the corrupt administration? Of course you do.
But its not a completely independent investigation. That needs to be completed by a third party not receiving financial compensation from the auditee. In short, if something was uncovered that was going to destroy the already dismal credibility of the WHO, it will never see the light of day. This is just PR damage control.
And they'll make up something if they have to, JUST because Trump doesn't like them. The government wastes all its time seeking vindication for the president that they can't even do their REAL jobs.
@joe-shmo saidUh-huh, so I was right.
I imagine the governments that fund them have two options. Pay for an independent investigation, or, if the juice isn't worth the squeeze, just withdrawal funding.
You want this corrupt administration to fund it.
No surprise there.