The WHO is investigating itself

So the WHO is paying some independent people to investigate it's handling of covid. No issue here . Next time I lie I will pay someone to investigate me.
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/world/2020/07/former-prime-minister-helen-clark-to-lead-world-health-organization-review-of-how-world-handled-covid-19.html

@gareth-cobb said
So the WHO is paying some independent people to investigate it's handling of covid. No issue here . Next time I lie I will pay someone to investigate me.
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/world/2020/07/former-prime-minister-helen-clark-to-lead-world-health-organization-review-of-how-world-handled-covid-19.html

Better than the USA handled it, that's for damned sure.

@suzianne said
Better than the USA handled it, that's for damned sure.

Like telling Trump not to close the border 😵

@gareth-cobb said
So the WHO is paying some independent people to investigate it's handling of covid. No issue here . Next time I lie I will pay someone to investigate me.
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/world/2020/07/former-prime-minister-helen-clark-to-lead-world-health-organization-review-of-how-world-handled-covid-19.html

External audits and/or reviews are quite commonplace in both government and industry.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/External_auditor

Glad to have informed you on this matter.

@kazetnagorra said
External audits and/or reviews are quite commonplace in both government and industry.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/External_auditor

Glad to have informed you on this matter.

Internal auditting is also very common.

@kazetnagorra said
External audits and/or reviews are quite commonplace in both government and industry.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/External_auditor

Glad to have informed you on this matter.

But its not a completely independent investigation. That needs to be completed by a third party not receiving financial compensation from the auditee. In short, if something was uncovered that was going to destroy the already dismal credibility of the WHO, it will never see the light of day. This is just PR damage control.

@gareth-cobb said
So the WHO is paying some independent people to investigate it's handling of covid. No issue here . Next time I lie I will pay someone to investigate me.
https://www.newshub.co.nz/home/world/2020/07/former-prime-minister-helen-clark-to-lead-world-health-organization-review-of-how-world-handled-covid-19.html

It's all about the money and when Tedros, who was on the take from China,
realized that Big Donor to WHO, the USA, was withdrawing membership
and dues, he must have crapped himself LOL

Just say NO to WHO

@joe-shmo said
But its not a completely independent investigation. That needs to be completed by a third party not receiving financial compensation from the auditee. In short, if something was uncovered that was going to destroy the already dismal credibility of the WHO, it will never see the light of day. This is just PR damage control.

Who should pay for it?

@kazetnagorra said
Who should pay for it?

I imagine the governments that fund them have two options. Pay for an independent investigation, or, if the juice isn't worth the squeeze, just withdrawal funding.

@joe-shmo said
I imagine the governments that fund them have two options. Pay for an independent investigation, or, if the juice isn't worth the squeeze, just withdrawal funding.

I see. So instead of those who fund the WHO paying for it, it should be those who fund the WHO?

@kazetnagorra said
I see. So instead of those who fund the WHO paying for it, it should be those who fund the WHO?

Word games?

Once the WHO has acquired funding, the funding for an "external audit" of the WHO itself is provided by the WHO itself, not those who funded the WHO.

If the WHO is party A, The "External Auditors" party B, And The Governments that Fund the WHO party C.

The investigation contracts and deliverables are between party A and party B in this circumstance. For impartiality and full disclosure the contracts and deliverables for the investigation of party A need to be between party C and party B.

@kazetnagorra said
Who should pay for it?

Hold your breath I am tring to think of someone everyone trusts

@gareth-cobb said
Like telling Trump not to close the border 😵

Like ignoring the problem until it was obvious it was already here. You don't shut the barn door after the horse is out.

@joe-shmo said
But its not a completely independent investigation. That needs to be completed by a third party not receiving financial compensation from the auditee. In short, if something was uncovered that was going to destroy the already dismal credibility of the WHO, it will never see the light of day. This is just PR damage control.

You mean it should be someone getting financial compensation from the corrupt administration? Of course you do.

And they'll make up something if they have to, JUST because Trump doesn't like them. The government wastes all its time seeking vindication for the president that they can't even do their REAL jobs.

@joe-shmo said
I imagine the governments that fund them have two options. Pay for an independent investigation, or, if the juice isn't worth the squeeze, just withdrawal funding.

Uh-huh, so I was right.

You want this corrupt administration to fund it.

No surprise there.