This is wno we COULD have had as president, just saying. It says nothing.

@AverageJoe1 said
You just reposted that one from February

Oh, since I mentioned it before, that means everything I said is BS?
Try again, it is well known Trump was a LITERAL puppet on Apprentice.
We ALL know the PRODUCERS said who was hired and fired not Trump.
And of course continues to be what he is best at, PUPPET.
Ask Putin how much he is afraid of the power of Trump.
Just wonder how you would reply AFTER Putin is rolling around the floor laughing his ass off.

@sonhouse said
I didn't think I HAD to say why they should ID themselves. For one TINY issue, so a supposed ICE agent, masked, refusing to ID themselves, what is it about that making you think, ok it's ok, I AM SAFE so no big deal.
Even though if YOU get a ticket from some dude claiming to be a cop but REFUSES to show ID like they are LEGALLY required to do, why do you think it is OK for ...[text shortened]... ir victims or steal their cars.
But for you, HO HUM, collateral damage, the ENDS JUSTIFY THE MEANS.

I started to give you a very good answer until I half-read your vile in the next to last paragraph. Slime comes in all forms

@sonhouse said
Funny how the Biden economy was going great guns

?

@sonhouse said
You are one sick SOB. You have the morals of an alligator.

Hey, sonhouse, where is everybody

@AverageJoe1 said
I started to give you a very good answer until I half-read your vile in the next to last paragraph. Slime comes in all forms

There IS NO GOOD answer. ICE is a result of Trump going literally ROGUE.

@AverageJoe1 said
I started to give you a very good answer until I half-read your vile in the next to last paragraph. Slime comes in all forms

And it's name is usually Joe.

@Suzianne said
And it's name is usually Joe.

wat'd i say?

@Mott-The-Hoople said
What the dems have is putting men in dresses in cabinet positions, men who marry men ect, It gave these freaks some sort of ok our perversions are fine now sense.

But they are not.

Meanwhile, your perversions, like taking food from the mouths of children by supporting the breakup of USAID, so millions will now die, are way, WAY more disgusting.

@AverageJoe1 said
I’m not writing about me personally I’m writing about success, and the Trump economy. I am trying to put that into everyone’s heads. I have been trying to for many years. No one listened to me. It was about all of you that I was writing, not about me. These are concepts that are misunderstood on the forum.

I'd rather have morals than to be rich.

@AverageJoe1 said
Speaking of gettin money, coffee buddies and I had bets on killings in Chicago this weekend, I said 11, one of them nailed it at 7. I lost 10 of my bucks 😡
None of us knew any of the victims

Yet you still think it okay to bet on human lives.

None in your party have any souls. You're all ghouls.

@AverageJoe1 said
In her way of what, Sue? She would have had no way, no path, no plan, no policy,,,,,,,,no way, don't you see? And sadly, her faux way that would have been created by her DEI cabinet would have impeded MY way. They would want my stuff. You know that.............right!?!?? Why do libs say right?

Stop lying.

@Suzianne said
Meanwhile, your perversions, like taking food from the mouths of children by supporting the breakup of USAID, so millions will now die, are way, WAY more disgusting.

Frankly, I acuiesce that the people against it were greater in numbers , so you are right in come circles. It was all a part of DOGE, and I guess the liberal mindset would have been against ANYTHING that DOGE did. Libs were actually saying 'don't fire federal workers' because they need jobs and have family, which is a zero reason to have them remain employed. Your side likely said keep them, my side and me say fire them. But, yes, if I were on a vote about USAID, I would likely have said to save USAID. But I would have demanded a trade-off, and said that if we are going to pay tuitions of losers??? Then, dismantle USAID. Can't have it both ways. Tit for Tat.

@Suzianne said
I'd rather have morals than to be rich.

A person I know, maybe 3 or 4 or 5 who are rich, have morals. Don't get you there. You are saying that you can't be both??

@Suzianne said
Yet you still think it okay to bet on human lives.

None in your party have any souls. You're all ghouls.

Ahhh, the little issue-misser. The issue is numbers, not lives. If I bet that one plane will crash next week , which woud kill people, and my friend bets none will crash, we are betting on crashes. Crashes. Murders.
I bet that Lou Gehrig will hit 3 home runs in this game. Three.

@AverageJoe1 said
Frankly, I acuiesce that the people against it were greater in numbers , so you are right in come circles. It was all a part of DOGE, and I guess the liberal mindset would have been against ANYTHING that DOGE did. Libs were actually saying 'don't fire federal workers' because they need jobs and have family, which is a zero reason to have them remain employed. Your side ...[text shortened]... going to pay tuitions of losers??? Then, dismantle USAID. Can't have it both ways. Tit for Tat.

It's not EVEN the same freaking thing.