@kmax87
The DOJ removed pictures of Trump with.....well we don't know.
I recall seeing a pic with Trump and a girl whose face was blacked out. That means she was a victim. No proof who victimized her aside from Epstein and Maxwell, but Trump is in a photo with a victim.
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5658618-doj-redactions-epstein-files/
Here is a link showing Trump with 6 victims.
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-appears-newly-released-photos-epstein-estate-2025-12-12/
This is going to be an endless saga.
Either trump did something and everything will be trailed out and redacted
Or trump did nothing and nobody is going to believe any of it.
The base line, Epstein was sex trafficking kids. And anybody in the vicinity of Epstein or those girls knew what the hell was happening.
Aren’t there like felony charges (like felony murder) in the US to deal with these bastards? All of them. trump included, but all of them.
I mean, if you know someone is being raped (which it is) and you do nothing, you don’t deserve the balls hanging between your bloody legs!
1 edit
@kmax87 saidI thought you had done something to get through the redacting. Just theory now.
Google George Dantzig. I'm hoping a similar phenomenon will work with this scenario. 😎
I did and he is a genuine national treasure but see nothing about penetrating redacted pages.
Besides, maybe the originals could have had some expert penetrate the redacting but copies on a printer? Doubt there would be any of that information left.
@sonhouse saidThe George Danzig aside was more along the lines of him solving problems considered almost impossible to solve because he just thought they were problems set for the whole class as homework. He missed the bit where the class was told how difficult the problems were to solve and that mathematicians had been trying to solve them for years without any success. Unencumbered by a low expectation of finding solutions and thinking the problems were at his level of expertise to solve, he promptly went away and solved them.
I thought you had done something to get through the redacting. Just theory now.
I did and he is a genuine national treasure but see nothing about penetrating redacted pages.
Besides, maybe the originals could have had some expert penetrate the redacting but copies on a printer? Doubt there would be any of that information left.
Now maybe just maybe me suggesting tongue firmly in cheek that I applied some filter to reveal the redacted content, might spur someone on to actually discover a technique to recover the redacted images. I mean if little old me can do it......
@Metal-Brain saidThe Trump condom--I'm HUUUUUUGE----
@kmax87
The DOJ removed pictures of Trump with.....well we don't know.
I recall seeing a pic with Trump and a girl whose face was blacked out. That means she was a victim. No proof who victimized her aside from Epstein and Maxwell, but Trump is in a photo with a victim.
https://thehill.com/homenews/administration/5658618-doj-redactions-epstein-files/
Here is a l ...[text shortened]... .
https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trump-appears-newly-released-photos-epstein-estate-2025-12-12/
😆
@kmax87 saidLike I said, a printer copy would be unlikely to have the original hidden because the printer just does the black layer. Don't know if even the original could use something easy, I mean maybe an Xray machine or neutron emission spectrogram might do it but I sold my last Xray and neutron emitter just last week🙂
The George Danzig aside was more along the lines of him solving problems considered almost impossible to solve because he just thought they were problems set for the whole class as homework. He missed the bit where the class was told how difficult the problems were to solve and that mathematicians had been trying to solve them for years without any success. Unencumbered by a l ...[text shortened]... ctually discover a technique to recover the redacted images. I mean if little old me can do it......
- Joined
- 09 Jan 22
- Moves
- 1139
@Metal-Brain saidNo, it doesn't.
@kmax87
The DOJ removed pictures of Trump with.....well we don't know.
I recall seeing a pic with Trump and a girl whose face was blacked out. That means she was a victim.
@Cliff-Mashburn saidYes it does. Notice that Dianna Ross' pic is not redacted. Richard Branson's pic is not redacted. Michael Jackson's pic is not redacted.
No, it doesn't.
@shavixmir saidThe DOJ redacted Trump's name, not victims. We have the evidence.
This is going to be an endless saga.
Either trump did something and everything will be trailed out and redacted
Or trump did nothing and nobody is going to believe any of it.
The base line, Epstein was sex trafficking kids. And anybody in the vicinity of Epstein or those girls knew what the hell was happening.
Aren’t there like felony charges (like felony murder) in ...[text shortened]... aped (which it is) and you do nothing, you don’t deserve the balls hanging between your bloody legs!
@sonhouse saidyup, I was kind of thinking maybe at the quantum level there maybe some trail of evidence left behind and maybe someone will eventually figure out how to recapture what was erased.
Like I said, a printer copy would be unlikely to have the original hidden because the printer just does the black layer. Don't know if even the original could use something easy, I mean maybe an Xray machine or neutron emission spectrogram might do it but I sold my last Xray and neutron emitter just last week🙂
Nothing more than wishful thinking right?
@kmax87 saidSo far. The real effort is getting those DOJ bastards to release them all unredacted.
yup, I was kind of thinking maybe at the quantum level there maybe some trail of evidence left behind and maybe someone will eventually figure out how to recapture what was erased.
Nothing more than wishful thinking right?