When you vote today remember you were denied a choice by the privately owned corporation the DNC who "selected" Kamala to be the democrat POTUS nominee. A judge admitted the DNC rigged the primary against Berni Sanders but that privately owned corporations do not have to follow their own rules. That is how the DNC is able to give the middle finger to democracy and the American voter has to decide if they can continue doing it without penalty.
https://ivn.us/posts/dnc-to-court-we-are-a-private-corporation-with-no-obligation-to-follow-our-rules
The American voter usually fails to vote out people who engage in unethical behavior. DWS resigned from the DNC in disgrace because she was exposed for conspiracy to rig the primary election. She is still in congress because people don't care if their side does the election meddling or they don't know. You now know. Do you care?
I don't like Trump, but I was denied a vote for or against Kamala in the primary. That is not democracy. I cannot vote for a "selection". It is like voting against democracy. All that talk about Trump being a threat to democracy is psychological projection. If Trump led an insurrection on Jan. 6th why wasn't anybody charged with insurrection? And why did the capitol police let protesters come in the capitol building through one of the out side doors and not get charged with seditious conspiracy? Because it was a setup.
@Metal-Brain saidA great forum-worthy post. Thanks.
When you vote today remember you were denied a choice by the privately owned corporation the DNC who "selected" Kamala to be the democrat POTUS nominee. A judge admitted the DNC rigged the primary against Berni Sanders but that privately owned corporations do not have to follow their own rules. That is how the DNC is able to give the middle finger to democracy and the Ame ...[text shortened]... ugh one of the out side doors and not get charged with seditious conspiracy? Because it was a setup.
- Joined
- 14 Mar 15
- Moves
- 29579
29d
@AverageJoe1 saidSure, but only in the forums of conspiracynuts.com
A great forum-worthy post. Thanks.
@Ghost-of-a-Duke saidI noticed you dropped the theory part because it is all provable fact.
Sure, but only in the forums of conspiracynuts.com
DWS conspired to rig the primary. Even the judge said so. But it is not illegal in the DNC because it is privately owned.
Conspiring to rig the election is perfectly legal in the DNC. That is why DWS is not in prison. The person who leaked the emails that proved it was put in prison. Assange.
29d
@Metal-Brain saidRanked Choice Voting (RCV) solves this. Put all candidates (e.g. 7 Republicans, 5 Democrats, all the minor party candidates) on one ballot (electronic, hopefully; to eliminate errors) and people vote for their first, second, 3rd choices - as far as they want to go. Paper copies can be printed out and held for a period for verification. But electronic ensures people don't screw up.
I don't like Trump, but I was denied a vote for or against Kamala in the primary. That is not democracy. I cannot vote for a "selection".
The counting starts by eliminating the least popular candidate. The people who voted for them first, their second choice is used. Repeat until the winner is declared.
RCV gets rid of primaries, makes political parties much less relevant, and lets people vote for whom they want rather than whom they hate the least.
There is no downside to RCV. It is used in Maine, but should be countrywide.
29d
@Metal-Brain saidSpruce and MB, what is your reasoned thinking about the EC. i.e, how can it NOT be mob rule? I know def of mob rule is a bit rough around the edges, but I speak of 51% of the nation controlling 49%, keeping in mind the pitiful wretches in WY who know one cares about, who just want a few truckloads of barb wire. Humor intended, to avoid raging Shouse answers. Thoughtful is better.
@spruce112358
I agree. I once created a thread about it on here long ago.
Good post.
ANother slant/////Why was it good with the Founders, but not now?
29d
@Metal-Brain said"selected" is how it works. Party caucuses were never designed to represent a democratic form of government.
When you vote today remember you were denied a choice by the privately owned corporation the DNC who "selected" Kamala to be the democrat POTUS nominee. A judge admitted the DNC rigged the primary against Berni Sanders but that privately owned corporations do not have to follow their own rules. That is how the DNC is able to give the middle finger to democracy and the Ame ...[text shortened]... ugh one of the out side doors and not get charged with seditious conspiracy? Because it was a setup.
Ranked choice is the way to go.
28d
@Metal-Brain saidStop with your lies.
When you vote today remember you were denied a choice by the privately owned corporation the DNC who "selected" Kamala to be the democrat POTUS nominee. A judge admitted the DNC rigged the primary against Berni Sanders but that privately owned corporations do not have to follow their own rules. That is how the DNC is able to give the middle finger to democracy and the Ame ...[text shortened]... ugh one of the out side doors and not get charged with seditious conspiracy? Because it was a setup.
28d
@Metal-Brain saidI am not your fello Ameican
When you vote today remember you were denied a choice by the privately owned corporation the DNC who "selected" Kamala to be the democrat POTUS nominee. A judge admitted the DNC rigged the primary against Berni Sanders but that privately owned corporations do not have to follow their own rules. That is how the DNC is able to give the middle finger to democracy and the Ame ...[text shortened]... ugh one of the out side doors and not get charged with seditious conspiracy? Because it was a setup.
28d
@wildgrass saidYou will still have the DNC though and it is a privately owned corporation which is why they don't have to respect democracy. Same with the RNC. IRV might help, but it does not address the root problem, privately owned corporations run our elections. The law does not see a distinction between corporations that run elections and those that do not.
"selected" is how it works. Party caucuses were never designed to represent a democratic form of government.
Ranked choice is the way to go.
Why aren't elections run by the government?
28d
@Metal-Brain saidThey are. Caucuses are not elections.
You will still have the DNC though and it is a privately owned corporation which is why they don't have to respect democracy. Same with the RNC. IRV might help, but it does not address the root problem, privately owned corporations run our elections. The law does not see a distinction between corporations that run elections and those that do not.
Why aren't elections run by the government?
28d
@Metal-Brain saidStop with your false givens.
You will still have the DNC though and it is a privately owned corporation which is why they don't have to respect democracy. Same with the RNC. IRV might help, but it does not address the root problem, privately owned corporations run our elections. The law does not see a distinction between corporations that run elections and those that do not.
Why aren't elections run by the government?