@suzianne saidThe real problem is people like Mott and his buddies are thoroughly brainwashed by Trump and no amount of actual reality will change that. The fact is there are MILLIONS of people just like him and will never admit Trump can do anything wrong. Just like the Suckaby Sanders show on ABC recently, 6 minutes of interview where she lied about lying but the base goes, lying is no longer a big deal, live with it asssholes.
Barr, "restoring trust"? After that crapshow of the release of Mueller's report?
No one's going to "trust" him to be dogcatcher after this. The Swamp grows bigger still.
I'm afraid we'll have to wait for the next real President to restore trust in anything Trump touched.
@suzianne saidwhat did Barr get wrong?
Barr, "restoring trust"? After that crapshow of the release of Mueller's report?
No one's going to "trust" him to be dogcatcher after this. The Swamp grows bigger still.
I'm afraid we'll have to wait for the next real President to restore trust in anything Trump touched.
@mott-the-hoople saidInformation is a "thing of value".
information is not illegal...noticed how you tried to slip “thing of value” in there.
#s**tweasel
would you say, with obama admin knowing russia was trying to influence the election should have been reported?
The Obama administration for months before the election was publicly saying the Russians were interfering with the election while at the same time the Donald was publicly disputing it.
1 edit
@no1marauder saidHold up there...you're lying again.
Information is a "thing of value".
The Obama administration for months before the election was publicly saying the Russians were interfering with the election while at the same time the Donald was publicly disputing it.
"EWING: No, that's not quite correct. The Obama administration had a great deal of internal debate in real time in 2016 about how to respond - whether they should do so publicly or privately. Ultimately, President Obama did so privately with the Russian president Vladimir Putin. He took him aside at an international summit and said, please stop interfering in our election - to no effect."
https://www.npr.org/2018/07/15/629281975/fact-check-did-the-obama-administration-respond-to-election-interference-by-russ
Now take that information and go spend the proceeds.
@mott-the-hoople saidThey also gave briefings to Congressional committees and Pelosi and Schumer gave a joint public statement in September 2016 saying that the Russians were interfering based on those briefing. Republican leaders refused to join in the statement and Trump publicly ridiculed it.
Hold up there...you're lying again.
"EWING: No, that's not quite correct. The Obama administration had a great deal of internal debate in real time in 2016 about how to respond - whether they should do so publicly or privately. Ultimately, President Obama did so privately with the Russian president Vladimir Putin. He took him aside at an international summit and sa ...[text shortened]... ion-respond-to-election-interference-by-russ
Now take that information and go spend the proceeds.
You really make the most easily refuted allegations of "lying" I've ever seen.