Go back
Trump: 300K Illegal Aliens Purged from Social Security Rolls

Trump: 300K Illegal Aliens Purged from Social Security Rolls

Debates

1 edit

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/05/01/trump-says-almost-300k-illegal-aliens-purged-from-social-security-rolls/

Trump Says Almost 300K Illegal Aliens Purged from Social Security Rolls
President Donald Trump announced that roughly 300,000 illegal aliens in the United States
have been removed from Social Security rolls, and added that 100,000 have been removed from Medicare.

----------------------------


Thieves, murderers, election stealers. As I have said all along...

THE DEMOCRATIC PARTY IS A CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION

Learn by this, people
---------------------------

TO ADD from AI:
President Donald Trump stated on Friday, May 1, 2026, that his administration has removed 300,000 illegal immigrants from the Social Security rolls.
This follows an earlier announcement in August 2025 where he claimed approximately 275,000 removals had already taken place


A career criminal tells you something and you believe him.


@Earl-of-Trumps said
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2026/05/01/trump-says-almost-300k-illegal-aliens-purged-from-social-security-rolls/

Trump Says Almost 300K Illegal Aliens Purged from Social Security Rolls
[i]President Donald Trump announced that roughly 300,000 illegal aliens in the United States
have been removed from Social Security rolls, and added that 100,000 have ...[text shortened]... ouncement in August 2025 where he claimed approximately 275,000 removals had already taken place[/b]
Is this like in 2016 when blacks, asians and latinos were removed from the voter rolls because Kris Kobach shopped around to swing states a list of names who had supposedly voted twice, or in different states? It was a list made up of whole cloth, yet he got swing states to remove the entire list off their voter rolls. This was done within 30 days of the General Election for the simple reason they could not get re-registered before the election. This resulted in Democrats being underrepresented in these states because of course these names showed up as being mostly Democrats. In this case the numbers involved was enough to swing the electoral vote for these states in 2016.

So is this list of supposedly "illegal aliens on Soc. Sec." just made up names like that? Are you asking us to believe that the Trump Administration, which arguably fails at everything else they try to do, actually targeted actual people, a supposedly 575,000 total over the past year? If you believe this, yes, you're an idiot. More like it, they just lazily invented a bunch of names, which resulted in removing a LOT of citizens, whose name happens to be Rodriguez or Martinez.

This tells me, that the Trump Administration is a criminal organization who wants to hurt American minorities in this country, and who is not above making sh-- up just to get elected.


The problem is that we can't believe anything coming out of this Liar-in-Chief's mouth, and especially covered by "Not-quite-the-news" Breitbart.

Are they also not news, but "entertainment", just like Fox News?


I'm not sure what the significance of this is, even if true. The fact is, whether here legally or not, immigrants working in the US are legally required to pay into Social Security (SS), just like any citizen; and just like any citizen, paying into SS doesn't necessarily translate into receiving SS benefits, and in most cases doesn't. How many of those who were "purged" were of retirement age or disabled? Were they "purged" because they had legal status, but the Trump administration decided to revoke that status on a whim?

A "purge" was also announced in April 2025, and as far as I know, such "purges" are an annual phenomenon in preparation for the next tax year.

It's frightening to think that, even if all 300,000 people who were "purged" were frauds who somehow made off with $100,000 of SS funds, that translates into $30 billion, which is just a fraction of the money wasted on a couple weeks of throwing missiles at Iran.


@Suzianne said
Is this like in 2016 when blacks, asians and latinos were removed from the voter rolls because Kris Kobach shopped around to swing states a list of names who had supposedly voted twice, or in different states? It was a list made up of whole cloth, yet he got swing states to remove the entire list off their voter rolls. This was done within 30 days of the General Election fo ...[text shortened]... o hurt American minorities in this country, and who is not above making sh-- up just to get elected.
Making shyt up like you just did?


@AThousandYoung said
A career criminal tells you something and you believe him.
Instead of chalking it all up to "Trump lies" - for the ten thousandth time, please tell us the truth, mister sniper man.


@Suzianne said
Is this like in 2016 when blacks, asians and latinos were removed from the voter rolls because Kris Kobach shopped around to swing states a list of names who had supposedly voted twice, or in different states? It was a list made up of whole cloth, yet he got swing states to remove the entire list off their voter rolls. This was done within 30 days of the General Election fo ...[text shortened]... o hurt American minorities in this country, and who is not above making sh-- up just to get elected.
That's a lot of verbiage just to say "I hate Trump"

Suzi, PROVE that the people taken off the voter rolls were victims of the evil Republicans.

If what you said was real, the democrats would b'ytch loud and forever. the transgressions you cite
are all things we with normal brains knew the democrats were guilty of anyway

Notice how the republicans don't get called out like this? Dead people on the registry...?
That should help the Repubs just as much as the dems, right??

Ya, suuuuuuuuuuuuuure


@Suzianne said
The problem is that we can't believe anything coming out of this Liar-in-Chief's mouth, and especially covered by "Not-quite-the-news" Breitbart.

Are they also not news, but "entertainment", just like Fox News?
Well, tell us the TRUTH, Suzi the Savior.

Just make sure you back it up with links.


@Soothfast said
I'm not sure what the significance of this is, even if true. The fact is, whether here legally or not, immigrants working in the US are legally required to pay into Social Security (SS), just like any citizen; and just like any citizen, paying into SS doesn't necessarily translate into receiving SS benefits, and in most cases doesn't. How many of those who were "purged" wer ...[text shortened]... illion, which is just a fraction of the money wasted on a couple weeks of throwing missiles at Iran.
Soothfast, serious question...

If a person was captured and detained in a murder in Denver, Colorado, would you defend that person
by saying - "Aw C'mon, there are hundreds and thousands killed in the Iran war"

I mean, what the f does one have to do with the other? 🙄


@Earl-of-Trumps said
Instead of chalking it all up to "Trump lies" - for the ten thousandth time, please tell us the truth, mister sniper man.
Truth about what?

That Trump is a career fraud and you don't care?

That he makes up numbers and you believe him?


@Earl-of-Trumps said
That's a lot of verbiage just to say "I hate Trump"

Suzi, PROVE that the people taken off the voter rolls were victims of the evil Republicans.

If what you said was real, the democrats would b'ytch loud and forever. the transgressions you cite
are all things we with normal brains knew the democrats were guilty of anyway

Notice how the republicans don't get c ...[text shortened]... registry...?
That should help the Repubs just as much as the dems, right??

Ya, suuuuuuuuuuuuuure
Probably didn't see this on Breitbart:

" Kansas failed Wednesday to resuscitate a proof-of-citizenship law that the 10th Circuit said “undisputedly has disenfranchised approximately 30,000 would-be Kansas voters.”" https://www.courthousenews.com/kansas-voter-id-law-struck-down-by-10th-circuit/

Kobach was, of course, the head of a commission appointed by Trump in his first term which was going to "prove" widespread voter fraud existed in the US. It met twice and never filed a report.

It's hardly surprising that the party that wants to limit and suppress voting esp. among minorities is the only one complaining about the virtually non-existent problem of voter fraud.


@Earl-of-Trumps said
Well, tell us the TRUTH, Suzi the Savior.

Just make sure you back it up with links.
Suzi was probably referring to Interstate Crosscheck started by Kobach in 2014. Here's an assessment:

"Investigative reporter Greg Palast obtained lists compiled by Crosscheck in 2014 of alleged double registrants from several states. The program is supposed to match first, middle and last name, plus birth date; it also provides the last four digits of a Social Security number for additional verification. But Palast found that a quarter of the listed names lacked a middle-name match, that the system ignored designations of Jr. and Sr., and that Social Security numbers weren't included on any of the lists he obtained.

He asked database expert Mark Swedlund to review the lists from Georgia and Virginia. Palast reports Swedlund's reaction in a story titled "The GOP's Stealth War Against Voters":

[Swedlund] was shocked by Crosscheck's "childish methodology." He added, "God forbid your name is Garcia, of which there are 858,000 in the U.S., and your first name is Joseph or Jose. You're probably suspected of voting in 27 states."

Swedlund's statistical analysis found that African-American, Latino and Asian names predominate, a simple result of the Crosscheck matching process, which spews out little more than a bunch of common names. No surprise: The U.S. Census data shows that minorities are overrepresented in 85 of 100 of the most common last names. If your name is Washington, there's an 89 percent chance you're African-American. If your last name is Hernandez, there's a 94 percent chance you're Hispanic. If your name is Kim, there's a 95 percent chance you're Asian.

This inherent bias results in an astonishing one in six Hispanics, one in seven Asian-Americans and one in nine African-Americans in Crosscheck states landing on the list. Was the program designed to target voters of color? "I'm a data guy," Swedlund says. "I can't tell you what the intent was. I can only tell you what the outcome is. And the outcome is discriminatory against minorities."

https://www.facingsouth.org/2016/09/controversial-anti-voter-fraud-program-risks-disenfranchising-voters-through-racial-bias


@no1marauder said
Probably didn't see this on Breitbart:

" Kansas failed Wednesday to resuscitate a proof-of-citizenship law that the 10th Circuit said “undisputedly has disenfranchised approximately 30,000 would-be Kansas voters.”" https://www.courthousenews.com/kansas-voter-id-law-struck-down-by-10th-circuit/

Kobach was, of course, the head of a commission appointed by Trump in his ...[text shortened]... mong minorities is the only one complaining about the virtually non-existent problem of voter fraud.
84% of the voters in this nation want the voting secured.

There is a reason why they feel that way









psssst. DEMOCRATS CHEAT


@no1marauder
facinfsouth.org lol

thanks for the spam, but no thanks.