@Zahlanzi saidOK by me, if you want to play tennis against a wall instead of a human -- kinda boring though, dontcha think?
i am torn.
yes he can be a troll
he can also be completely insane.
if you assume he is a troll then you just ignore him. that means i don't get to have this twisted fun of pointing out obvious logic flaws when imbeciles like him post here.
this is all pointless anyway, so except for the venting because of unjust and uncaring reality. Latest example being "how t ...[text shortened]... close "
so let me have my fun assuming he is not a troll and he actually believes what he says
@moonbus saidhey, if you make a a real debate thread i will join in 😀 at the very least until the trolls or imbeciles or imbecilic trolls run it into the ground
OK by me, if you want to play tennis against a wall instead of a human -- kinda boring though, dontcha think?
we can even agree from the start to ignore any posts from them and not turn it into a freak show.
this reminded me to check philosophia club, but nope, apart from one thread, last post is from 83days ago
@Ponderable saidHillary Clinton lost the election and claimed Trump stole the election from her after she conceded. So no different than what Trump did except she conceded first which makes it worse.
Yes there is: he lost the election and thinks to be unfair.
Yes he was convicted by a jury (more than once) and thinks this to be unfair.
So in his world there is much reason for revenge. In any objective considertuion there is none.
Those convictions will be overturned on appeal. I am willing to bet on it because of the blatant hypocrisy. Hillary didn't use campaign money to pay off a porn actress, but she did use campaign money to pay for the Steele Dossier which was used for law fare against Trump. Why wasn't Hitlery convicted for that?
You should not take Trump's rhetoric literally. Don't you know he is a blowhard who talks crap all of the time? Remember when he said he was going to lock her up? Then he said "oh...I think she has suffered enough".
Why didn't he follow through with revenge and lock Hillary up?
Because it was pure political rhetoric. He is just talking crap like he always does.
@Metal-Brain said"Hillary Clinton lost the election and claimed Trump stole the election from her after she conceded"
Hillary Clinton lost the election and claimed Trump stole the election from her after she conceded. So no different than what Trump did except she conceded first which makes it worse.
Those convictions will be overturned on appeal. I am willing to bet on it because of the blatant hypocrisy. Hillary didn't use campaign money to pay off a porn actress, but she did use ca ...[text shortened]... k Hillary up?
Because it was pure political rhetoric. He is just talking crap like he always does.
First of all she conceded. Immediately.
Secondly she made vague accusations about Russia and voter purging and suppression that would make the election, which she didn't dispute he won, "unfair"
Thirdly, she didn't sue and lose in like 60 courts.
"You should not take Trump's rhetoric literally"
So he doesn't really mean it. So i guess i shouldn't take his rhetoric that he is going to fix the economy literally either, right? Or that he will fix the border? What else shouldn't i take literally? When he said that he will allow abortion exceptions? Or when he said he will not allow abortion exceptions.
"Don't you know he is a blowhard who talks crap all of the time?"
That's what i want from a president. And the president of the most powerful country in the world. Them talking crap all of the time.
Also, i wonder how you could have phrased it differently? Oh yeah, he lies.
"Remember when he said he was going to lock her up? Then he said "oh...I think she has suffered enough". "
So your defence of him is that he lies a lot? And i should just guess what he actually means? What he will actually act on? What he will change his mind on?
@Zahlanzi saidThat is impossible. A president does not have the power to do that unilaterally. Trump could offer it, but it has to be accepted to happen.
he said he would use the military against american citizens of the wrong political affiliation
she said maybe twitter should enforce its rules and ban him on their platform for flagrantly violating those rules. Before it was X and turned into a fascist propaganda tool .
who the fascist is is obvious to any but the most retarded or the most shameless
Trump is just spewing rhetoric to ruffle the feathers of the ignorant people like sonhouse. Trump does that on purpose to divide people.
@Zahlanzi
"First of all she conceded"
I know. That makes it much worse.
Congads......oh wait you stole it from me! Conspiracy theory that the Russians colluded with Trump. Then she paid for the Steele Dossier used for law fare against Trump paid for with campaign money which she was fined for by the FEC.
Aside from a porn actress being involved how is what Hitlery did any different than what Trump did? They both used campaign money and failed to report it.
@moonbus saidIt was not Trump's idea. Somebody else came up with it first.
@sonhouse
If Trump’s proposal to deploy the military against civilians does not set off alarm bells at the NRA, then his supporters have been well and truly brain fu*ked. As any diehard NRA supporter will tell you, the right to keep and bear arms is not designed principally for the homeowner to defend himself against burglars, but for the citizenry to defend itself again ...[text shortened]... goobermint. You might remember the shootout at Waco TX between federal agents and Branch Davidians.
Trump is just backing up the idea which is scary.
https://rumble.com/v5j0agp-pentagons-new-plans-for-military-deployment-will-shock-you.html?e9s=src_v1_ucp
Is the Pentagon setting off alarm bells for you?
@Metal-Brain saidIt is already accepted by his base.
That is impossible. A president does not have the power to do that unilaterally. Trump could offer it, but it has to be accepted to happen.
Trump is just spewing rhetoric to ruffle the feathers of the ignorant people like sonhouse. Trump does that on purpose to divide people.
You know, the Jan. 6 mob?
@sonhouse saidhttps://thedailybell.com/all-articles/news-analysis/unreal-projection-democrats-suddenly-concerned-about-political-weaponization-of-the-state/
https://www.cnn.com/2024/10/14/politics/video/trump-military-enemy-within-fox-news-cnntm-digvid
More proof he is not in the slightest interested in actual policy but 100% into revenge.
Just what we want in a POTUS.
@Zahlanzi saidHere ya go:
hey, if you make a a real debate thread i will join in 😀 at the very least until the trolls or imbeciles or imbecilic trolls run it into the ground
we can even agree from the start to ignore any posts from them and not turn it into a freak show.
this reminded me to check philosophia club, but nope, apart from one thread, last post is from 83days ago
Thread 201002
Until the trolls crash the party.