Go back
Trump does not place left hand on Bible

Trump does not place left hand on Bible

Debates

1 edit

@AverageJoe1 said
The U.S. Constitution does not stipulate that a president-to-be place his or her hand on a Bible when taking the Oath, because each president who recites this oath or affirmation is “bound” by the words themselves, per Article VI. The same article also says that “no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United Sta ...[text shortened]... easing Trump could get out of hand if this thread falls into the wrond hands , like sue or Zhalanzi!
LMAO! YOU brought it up, not me. Of course, it has no legal effect - he doesn't have to swear on the Bible at all - it's just his stupidity in forgetting to put his hand on the Bible when it was right next to him in his wife's hands. Like I said, he is old and somewhat feeble minded so it's understandable.

And, of course, if a Democrat had forgotten to do so, the screeching from right wingers would be deafening. So this is just typical hypocrisy from the weak and gullible like you and Mott.


This thread is hilarious. It's already shaping up to be a fun four years.

2 edits

@AverageJoe1 said
Your complex issues are very difficult to respond to...like Suzianne's.

I do not even understand your last sentence, what Bitcoin has to do with anything.
Your complex issues are very difficult to respond to...like Suzianne's.

I'm sure they are for you little joe; I guess that means I and Suzanne are above you in brains; as most here are.
I find it funny that you were in this forum posting a thread defending Dump, before anyone else said anything; on why he didn't place his hand on the Bible during his oath to lead our country. Strange indeed. 😏 That's something a lover would do for their partner. πŸ™‚

I do not even understand your last sentence, what Bitcoin has to do with anything.


@Sleepyguy said
This thread is hilarious. It's already shaping up to be a fun four years.
I think Mott's "Fauci killed more than Hitler" is funnier but humor is a personal taste.

3 edits

@KingDavid403 said
Your complex issues are very difficult to respond to...like Suzianne's.

I'm sure they are for you little joe; I guess that means I and Suzanne are above you in brains; as most here are.
I find it funny that you were in this forum posting a thread defending Dump, before anyone else said anything; on why he didn't place his hand on the Bible during his oath to lead our country. Strange indeed. 😏 That's something a lover would do for their partner. πŸ™‚
Let us list all the 'strange' (funny, as you say) posters. πŸ€”


@no1marauder said
I think Mott's "Fauci killed more than Hitler" is funnier but humor is a personal taste.
what did he receive a pardon for?

scotus has ruled accepting a pardon is admission of guilt!


@AverageJoe1 said
Let us list all the 'strange' (funny, as you say) posters. πŸ€”
I'm glad that YOU were the first to notice that he refused to place his hand on the Bible during his oath.


@KingDavid403 said
Your complex issues are very difficult to respond to...like Suzianne's.

I'm sure they are for you little joe; I guess that means I and Suzanne are above you in brains; as most here are.
I find it funny that you were in this forum posting a thread defending Dump, before anyone else said anything; on why he didn't place his hand on the Bible during his oath to lead our country. Strange indeed. 😏 That's something a lover would do for their partner. πŸ™‚
you queers are funny little fellers πŸ˜‚


@Mott-The-Hoople said
you queers are funny little fellers πŸ˜‚
I'm not the one with a picture of another man on my avatar; you are. πŸ˜‰


@Sleepyguy said
This thread is hilarious. It's already shaping up to be a fun four years.
Could we nominate you to edit Sonhouse posts to , number 1, shorten them, and then, number 2, give them a bit of substance. He hides his true points under a bushel, as my granny used to say.


@KingDavid403 said
I'm not the one with a picture of another man on my avatar; you are. πŸ˜‰
πŸ˜†


@KingDavid403 said
I'm not the one with a picture of another man on my avatar; you are. πŸ˜‰
glad you like my avatar…f boy

1 edit

@moonbus said
It's not just that he did not put his hand on the Bible. He 'swore' with the wrong hand raised. That's the crux of the biscuit right there, and it was deliberate. It's the equivalent of making a schoolyard promise with your fingers crossed behind your back--making the promise not binding. Just you wait ... he'll claim he never swore an oath to uphold the Constitution.
OK, I just watched the video. He raised his right hand, as instructed by the Chief Justice. Where his left hand was is not visible in the video. However, still photos from a different angle clearly show Melania holding two thick books, and she's too far away from him for his hand to be on either of them.

https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/donald-trump-inauguration-highlights-january-20-2025-white-house-jd-vance/article69118688.ece


@AverageJoe1 said
O my gaaa, Shouse is about to come out of the gate!!! It is a flawed swearing-in!!

https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-inauguration-hand-bible-swearing-in/story?id=117897715
the problem would be the hypocrisy, ya dingus. We know damn well Trump is Christian only for the sheep who vote him. Touching or not touching a fictional book should have 0 meaning.

If Obama did this you would claim he is the anti-christ. Or muslim (which you did anyway).


We could do the same and say Trump is possessed by Satan himself... if it were not so damn stupid to stoop to your level

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.