I don't know...Trump did phenomenally well in debates (as far as appealing to the audience). In fact, even when he was booed once, he still won the state the debate was held in.
By now, Trump should be well aware that he can win debates with stage presence alone. I doubt he's actually afraid of Hillary, who has a rather weak stage presence (perceived as "frigid" "shrill", etc.).
Originally posted by vivifyyes, in the freak show that was the republican "debate".
I don't know...Trump did phenomenally well in debates (as far as appealing to the audience). In fact, even when he was booed once, he still won the state the debate was held in.
By now, Trump should be well aware that he can win debates with stage presence alone. I doubt he's actually afraid of Hillary, who has a rather weak stage presence (perceived as "frigid" "shrill", etc.).
this time it is 1v1 and clinton will destroy him.
"I doubt he's actually afraid of Hillary"
he is the guy who didn't know russia already invaded ukraine going up against a career politician. all she has to do is calling him out on his lack of policy on anything, backed by no facts and to do it with simple enough words to bait him into losing it on stage.
Originally posted by Zahlanziall she has to do is calling him out on his lack of policy on anything, backed by no facts and to do it with simple enough words to bait him into losing it on stage.[/b]You mean the same exact tactics all the other "career politicians" Trump destroyed used?
There's also a huge difference this time: his opponent has been proven a liar by the FBI. Trump could absolutely bury her with a few well-placed zingers (which he's good at), especially now, since the FBI report is still fairly recent.
Originally posted by vivifydude, he destroyed cruz, rubio and jeb
You mean the same exact tactics all the other "career politicians" Trump destroyed used?
There's also a huge difference this time: his opponent has been proven a liar by the FBI. Trump could absolutely bury her with a few well-placed zingers (which he's good at), especially now, since the FBI report is still fairly recent.
"There's also a huge difference this time: his opponent has been proven a liar by the FBI. "
between hillary lying and trump lying there is no contest.
EDIT: also there is one particular public for the republican crap fest. the whole nation is watching the presidential debate.
- Joined
- 10 Dec 06
- Moves
- 8528
Originally posted by Zahlanzi"between hillary lying and trump lying there is no contest"
dude, he destroyed cruz, rubio and jeb
"There's also a huge difference this time: his opponent has been proven a liar by the FBI. "
between hillary lying and trump lying there is no contest.
I totally agree with you...Lets just go ahead and put that statement into context, shall we?
https://www.facebook.com/wesley.davis.3762/videos/1154437641283093/
Yeeeeeah, like both of us stated, CLEARLY no contest.
03 Aug 16
Originally posted by joe shmohow about you link each candidate's politifact page instead of ANOTHER email video. again.
"between hillary lying and trump lying there is no contest"
I totally agree with you...Lets just go ahead and put that statement into context, shall we?
https://www.facebook.com/wesley.davis.3762/videos/1154437641283093/
Yeeeeeah, like both of us stated, CLEARLY no contest.
seems the only thing you can find on clinton is that she lied about some emails.
- Joined
- 10 Dec 06
- Moves
- 8528
Originally posted by ZahlanziWhat was the level of classification of a portion of those emails as reported under sworn testimony by the Intellegence Community Inspector General, David McCullough? I repeat, because your reading comprehension is abysmal: What was the level of classification of a portion of those emails as reported under sworn testimony by the Intellegence Community Inspector General, David McCullough?
how about you link each candidate's politifact page instead of ANOTHER email video. again.
seems the only thing you can find on clinton is that she lied about some emails.
Exactly... I don't bother looking for anything else, becuase that is literally all the information he needs to win any debate with that criminal.
LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP!...
Originally posted by vivifyIf you recall, when Kasich dropped out of the race and there was nothing but Trump and Cruz, Trump refused to debate anymore.
I don't know...Trump did phenomenally well in debates (as far as appealing to the audience). In fact, even when he was booed once, he still won the state the debate was held in.
By now, Trump should be well aware that he can win debates with stage presence alone. I doubt he's actually afraid of Hillary, who has a rather weak stage presence (perceived as "frigid" "shrill", etc.).
I think once Trump was up in the polls over Cruz, he did not see the benefit to debating him anymore.
In the case of Hillary, Trump never had the intention of beating her to begin with. His role was just to prevent Cruz from winning the nomination and then the Oval Office, both of which would have happened had the Clintons not convinced Trump to run.
03 Aug 16
Originally posted by joe shmoLaughable. Party-line ideologues, following the Republican-drawn narrative.
"between hillary lying and trump lying there is no contest"
I totally agree with you...Lets just go ahead and put that statement into context, shall we?
https://www.facebook.com/wesley.davis.3762/videos/1154437641283093/
Yeeeeeah, like both of us stated, CLEARLY no contest.
Thinking for themselves isn't their strong suit.
Originally posted by joe shmoOh, you mean yet another Republican ideologue?
What was the level of classification of a portion of those emails as reported under sworn testimony by the Intellegence Community Inspector General, David McCullough? I repeat, because your reading comprehension is abysmal: [b]What was the level of classification of a portion of those emails as reported under sworn testimony by the Intellegence Community In ...[text shortened]... tion he needs to win any debate with that criminal.
LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP! LOCK HER UP!...
Right, totally believable. Not.
Why don't you repeat it another dozen times?
It seems that's all any of you have to do to get the Party-faithful chanting. Thinking for yourselves not required. At all.
03 Aug 16
Originally posted by SuzianneAnd you are proud of Hillary and the DNC, are you not?
Oh, you mean yet another Republican ideologue?
Right, totally believable. Not.
Why don't you repeat it another dozen times?
It seems that's all any of you have to do to get the Party-faithful chanting. Thinking for yourselves not required. At all.
03 Aug 16
Originally posted by whodeyThere are nut-jobs, those who have to be told what to think, and then there is bat-**** crazy.
If you recall, when Kasich dropped out of the race and there was nothing but Trump and Cruz, Trump refused to debate anymore.
I think once Trump was up in the polls over Cruz, he did not see the benefit to debating him anymore.
In the case of Hillary, Trump never had the intention of beating her to begin with. His role was just to prevent Cruz from win ...[text shortened]... the Oval Office, both of which would have happened had the Clintons not convinced Trump to run.
Which are you?