@averagejoe1 saidyeeeeeeeeeeesh. You want SCOTUS deciding immigration policy?
Our suffering will increase dramatically when SCOTUS finally relents, and they will. I guarantee they will.
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
@wildgrass
SCOTUS can decide whether a policy is unconstitutional or not, so, yes, they can and should step in.
A president that is not protecting our borders should be removed from office.
2 edits
@wildgrass saidNo, you are correct they should not. I love the latest comment by Neil Gorsuch. The only reason I say they will relent is because the liberals have pretty much changed the course of the world and will win in the end. I cannot imagine title 42 staying in place.
yeeeeeeeeeeesh. You want SCOTUS deciding immigration policy?
Gorsuch: “ the current border crisis is not a Covid crisis. Courts should not be in the business of perpetuating administrative.edicts designed for one emergency only because elected officials have failed to addressed a different emergency”.
You’ll have to love this guy. Siding with the creepy libs who want to change the constitution!
@jj-adams saidYes, but you say they ‘can’ decide whether a policy is constitutional or not. Young feller , that is ALL they do.
@wildgrass
SCOTUS can decide whether a policy is unconstitutional or not, so, yes, they can and should step in.
A president that is not protecting our borders should be removed from office.
@shavixmir saidI hope all the far right wing crazies who tend to reject vaccinations will succumb to the Darwin Effect.
How ever does the US cope?
- Joined
- 23 Feb 22
- Moves
- 1798
1 edit
@averagejoe1 saidOh come on, I said they can, because it's what they do.
Yes, but you say they ‘can’ decide whether a policy is constitutional or not. Young feller , that is ALL they do.
Correcting me by saying it's ALL they do was a little nit-picky.
Are you turning into a shavmix on me?
@phranny saidY’all follow the vax world like you do the. Trump world. Zzzzzz
I hope all the far right wing crazies who tend to reject vaccinations will succumb to the Darwin Effect.
1 edit
@jj-adams saidWell, with all due respect, one must nevertheless shine a light on the most minimal of distortions or misrepresentation that might lead our lesser debaters along the wrong trail. We can’t have them thinking that Scotus does anything more than apply the constitution to an issue ‘at the Bar’!
Oh come on, I said they can, because it's what they do.
Correcting me by saying it's ALL they do was a little nit-picky.
Are you turning into a shavmix on me?
@jj-adams saidWell, if we are required to put the blame, somewhere on all the death, I would think it would be on the Democratic administration. Fauci, maybe.? .Have you seen the news ? don’t get mad at us!
Meanwhile a whole generation of young people are getting heart problems.
My palpitations stared after my Covid shots.
@averagejoe1 saidWrong take. He's just saying it isn't the courts job to make up our laws. That used to be a well accepted sentiment, especially among conservatives. Your legislators have let you down for decades.
No, you are correct they should not. I love the latest comment by Neil Gorsuch. The only reason I say they will relent is because the liberals have pretty much changed the course of the world and will win in the end. I cannot imagine title 42 staying in place.
Gorsuch: “ the current border crisis is not a Covid crisis. Courts should not be in the business of perpetuat ...[text shortened]... .
You’ll have to love this guy. Siding with the creepy libs who want to change the constitution!