@AverageJoe1
Are you being deliberately obtuse or are you just naturally that stupid?
I said nothing about billionaires owning several homes.
I SAID the problem is those dudes paying of SCOTUS with extremely expensive vacation bennies and then finding oh so strangely the cases that come before SCOTUS mysteriously coincide with the desires of said billionaires.
THAT is called corruption by any definition of the word.
And apparently you either condone it or don't know what I am talking about.
@sonhouse saidIf that is happening, any such justice should be treated by what the law provides. I am not about studying up on that law, or carrying a sign, I can only elect people to get rid of judges who violate their oaths.
@AverageJoe1
Are you being deliberately obtuse or are you just naturally that stupid?
I said nothing about billionaires owning several homes.
I SAID the problem is those dudes paying of SCOTUS with extremely expensive vacation bennies and then finding oh so strangely the cases that come before SCOTUS mysteriously coincide with the desires of said billionaires.
THAT is ...[text shortened]... definition of the word.
And apparently you either condone it or don't know what I am talking about.
Sorry, I sure thought that you and Wgrass and Spruce, et al are against rich people getting richer or some such. Posts just today alluded to that. I am glad that I was wrong about you, and that you find it OK for people to improve their lot in life,, anyway that they want to as long as they do not bother other people in any way.
You might find a thread with Spruce and me where he curiously implies that people can live off of other people. I like plain english. When I say 'some people work harder than others', I don't get no plainer than that. This concept, and that of living off other people, is difficult for libs to wrangle.
I hope you will at least credit me with common sense. Next libs will be telling us how many kids we can have. Can you imagine repubs doing that?
@AverageJoe1
Like I said, you are either being deliberately obtuse or naturally stupid.
Either that or you are extremely naive.
You need to catch up on Corruption 101, either that or you are totally ok with billionaires courting SCTOUS.
If you actually want to know about corruption at the highest level in SCOTUS, read this:
https://endcitizensunited.org/latest-news/press-releases/keeping-up-with-the-courts-corruption/
@sonhouse saidI tried to read this, but got lost with your distinction about certain people in your soliloquy being billionaires., I am not being obtuse, as this comes up a lot, but could you tell us one more time about their wealth being an issue with these people?
@AverageJoe1
Like I said, you are either being deliberately obtuse or naturally stupid.
Either that or you are extremely naive.
You need to catch up on Corruption 101, either that or you are totally ok with billionaires courting SCTOUS.
If you actually want to know about corruption at the highest level in SCOTUS, read this:
https://endcitizensunited.org/latest-news/press-releases/keeping-up-with-the-courts-corruption/
@sonhouse saidExactly.
@AverageJoe1
Are you being deliberately obtuse or are you just naturally that stupid?
I said nothing about billionaires owning several homes.
I SAID the problem is those dudes paying of SCOTUS with extremely expensive vacation bennies and then finding oh so strangely the cases that come before SCOTUS mysteriously coincide with the desires of said billionaires.
THAT is ...[text shortened]... definition of the word.
And apparently you either condone it or don't know what I am talking about.
But Republicans can't be bothered with ethics.
@kmax87 saidBut you see, her wealth has nothing to do with me. Does a carpenter on the street worry about my net worth? What a waste of time for that carpenter, he could be advancing himself, start a carpenter company. Does he stare into his breakfast this morning and think about people who are wealthy? Mr Stihl made his chain saw, and got rich. Does he dislike Mr. Stihl? I do not understand you people, I really don't.
I hope you felt the same way about Nancy Pelosi's wealth.
Nancy Pelosi?
@AverageJoe1 saidAnd remember it.
Sue thus implies, Democrats do not have ethics problems. Write this in your journals.
It's the result of choosing a pathological liar as your candidate.
Your guy will always be a sleaze.
@AverageJoe1
Sorry to hear you had two heart replacements, that has to suck, immune drugs forever?
- Joined
- 05 Nov 06
- Moves
- 146003
@sonhouse saidLOL
@AverageJoe1
Sorry to hear you had two heart replacements, that has to suck, immune drugs forever?
@Mott-The-Hoople
What the hell? You think it's a joke someone gets heart replacement?
Making a joke out of it?
@sonhouse saidThis right here is why I'd like to have a beer with sonhouse even though we disagree on everything.
@AverageJoe1
Sorry to hear you had two heart replacements, that has to suck, immune drugs forever?