Go back
UK airports in bomb threat chaos

UK airports in bomb threat chaos

Debates

W
Instant Buzz

C#minor

Joined
28 Feb 05
Moves
16344
Clock
10 Aug 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

In case you haven't heard, UK security forces say they have foiled a plot to blow up around twenty planes in the air.

At the moment, airports are not admitting any hand luggage apart from passport and boarding pass and there are many security procedures in place causing chaos.

One thing I don't understand that someone might be able to explain is the odd security measure of making people publically taste any liquids they may have on them, such as babies' food. What is the point of this?

If the liquid were actually an explosive then presumably the person carrying it knows this and is prepared to kill themselves on the plane. In that case, I can't see that they would have any qualms about taking a sip of the stuff before boarding,

R
Godless Commie

Glasgow

Joined
06 Jan 04
Moves
171019
Clock
10 Aug 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wheely
In case you haven't heard, UK security forces say they have foiled a plot to blow up around twenty planes in the air.

At the moment, airports are not admitting any hand luggage apart from passport and boarding pass and there are many security procedures in place causing chaos.

One thing I don't understand that someone might be able to explain is the od ...[text shortened]... I can't see that they would have any qualms about taking a sip of the stuff before boarding,
Does seem a bit daft, but maybe the substance tastes so vile you can't drink it, or perhaps it induces vomitting?

ab

Joined
28 Nov 05
Moves
24334
Clock
10 Aug 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wheely
At the moment, airports are not admitting any hand luggage apart from passport and boarding pass and there are many security procedures in place causing chaos.
Having foiled the plot, these security measures are supposed to be in case there is a backup plan or there is another group they were unaware of.

Well, what if the backup plan is to explode the bombs on trains or the underground instead ?

Mat Kelley

all at sea

Joined
21 Apr 03
Moves
67920
Clock
10 Aug 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by aging blitzer
Having foiled the plot, these security measures are supposed to be in case there is a backup plan or there is another group they were unaware of.

Well, what if the backup plan is to explode the bombs on trains or the underground instead ?
Then there will be a big bang. But wouldn't you rather they did something proactive?

ab

Joined
28 Nov 05
Moves
24334
Clock
10 Aug 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

They did. They foiled a plot.
But in my opinion, temporary extra security measures are pointless.
If someone has an explosive that they can get through the normal security measures, then they can do it tomorrow when this has all blown over.

s

Joined
22 Oct 03
Moves
116855
Clock
28 Aug 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

You have to wonder....What if the plot had not been discovered,what if 20 odd planes had blown up some where over the Atlantic.....What would the World be like today?

W
Instant Buzz

C#minor

Joined
28 Feb 05
Moves
16344
Clock
28 Aug 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by shrew
You have to wonder....What if the plot had not been discovered,what if 20 odd planes had blown up some where over the Atlantic.....What would the World be like today?
Slightly lighter.

X
Cancerous Bus Crash

p^2.sin(phi)

Joined
06 Sep 04
Moves
25076
Clock
28 Aug 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wheely
Slightly lighter.
How's that work? The bits and pieces of the people and planes would still be around and would still weigh the same.

Also, as I've posted before, the way these guys were going about it is almost laughable. They'd have to spend two hours in a bathroom adding drops of one liquid into another which was mounted in an ice bucket while breathing foul smelling gases.
I'm pretty sure someone would notice.

W
Instant Buzz

C#minor

Joined
28 Feb 05
Moves
16344
Clock
28 Aug 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by XanthosNZ
How's that work? The bits and pieces of the people and planes would still be around and would still weigh the same.
Well, I guess you're right unless we accept the notion of a soul and we accept that it has some weight which, personally, I don't.

X
Cancerous Bus Crash

p^2.sin(phi)

Joined
06 Sep 04
Moves
25076
Clock
28 Aug 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wheely
Well, I guess you're right unless we accept the notion of a soul and we accept that it has some weight which, personally, I don't.
12 grams hurrrr.

N

The sky

Joined
05 Apr 05
Moves
10385
Clock
28 Aug 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wheely
Well, I guess you're right unless we accept the notion of a soul and we accept that it has some weight which, personally, I don't.
But even if we'd accept the notion of a soul with a weight, does the soul lose its weight (or some of its weight) when the person dies? Or does the soul leave the world? According to some people, hell is located in the centre of the earth, in which case I guess at least the souls of the people who go to hell would still contribute to the weight of the world. Maybe the souls going to heaven wouldn't.

W
Instant Buzz

C#minor

Joined
28 Feb 05
Moves
16344
Clock
28 Aug 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
But even if we'd accept the notion of a soul with a weight, does the soul lose its weight (or some of its weight) when the person dies? Or does the soul leave the world? According to some people, hell is located in the centre of the earth, in which case I guess at least the souls of the people who go to hell would still contribute to the weight of the world. Maybe the souls going to heaven wouldn't.
Well, my feeling would be that at least some of the souls would leave the Earth. Even if everyone is going to hell, there must, statistically be at least one baby on twenty planes and as we know, a baby is going to go to heaven. If we assume that hell is, in fact, underneath the ground, those souls that enter are not going to add to the overall weight of the world. However, if Hell is actually an off-Earth location, which seems likely given the space required for all the souls that it already contains, then this only adds strength to my supposition.

N

The sky

Joined
05 Apr 05
Moves
10385
Clock
28 Aug 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wheely
Well, my feeling would be that at least some of the souls would leave the Earth. Even if everyone is going to hell, there must, statistically be at least one baby on twenty planes and as we know, a baby is going to go to heaven. If we assume that hell is, in fact, underneath the ground, those souls that enter are not going to add to the overall weight of th ...[text shortened]... ired for all the souls that it already contains, then this only adds strength to my supposition.
Now you are suddenly talking about Earth? I thought we were talking about the World.

W
Instant Buzz

C#minor

Joined
28 Feb 05
Moves
16344
Clock
28 Aug 06
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Nordlys
Now you are suddenly talking about Earth? I thought we were talking about the World.
Sorry, yes I was. However, I was using the term "Earth" to refer to the World because then we would be clear which world we were talking about.

X
Cancerous Bus Crash

p^2.sin(phi)

Joined
06 Sep 04
Moves
25076
Clock
28 Aug 06
1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wheely
as we know, a baby is going to go to heaven
The Catholic Church doesn't know that.

EDIT: But then again they don't know much.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.